Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1030195AbVLFTRZ (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Dec 2005 14:17:25 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1030196AbVLFTRZ (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Dec 2005 14:17:25 -0500 Received: from thunk.org ([69.25.196.29]:26275 "EHLO thunker.thunk.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030195AbVLFTRY (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Dec 2005 14:17:24 -0500 Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2005 13:19:19 -0500 From: "Theodore Ts'o" To: Greg KH Cc: Tim Bird , David Woodhouse , arjan@infradead.org, andrew@walrond.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Linux in a binary world... a doomsday scenario Message-ID: <20051206181919.GA19905@thunk.org> Mail-Followup-To: Theodore Ts'o , Greg KH , Tim Bird , David Woodhouse , arjan@infradead.org, andrew@walrond.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <1133779953.9356.9.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> <200512051826.06703.andrew@walrond.org> <1133817575.11280.18.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1133817888.9356.78.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> <1133819684.11280.38.camel@localhost.localdomain> <4394D396.1020102@am.sony.com> <20051206041215.GC26602@kroah.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20051206041215.GC26602@kroah.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1622 Lines: 34 On Mon, Dec 05, 2005 at 08:12:16PM -0800, Greg KH wrote: > On Mon, Dec 05, 2005 at 03:56:06PM -0800, Tim Bird wrote: > > DISCLAIMER: I'm not speaking for Sony here. Personally > > I don't believe that most drivers are derivative works > > of the operating systems they run with, and I don't > > believe it helps Linux to assert that they are. > > But, hey, it's not my kernel, and not my plan for > > world domination. ;-) > > Why do people bring up the "derivative works" issue all the time. Are > they so blind to the very simple "linking" issue that all kernel modules > do when they are loaded into the kernel? The linked kernel+module combination is pretty clearly a derived work (but I am not a lawyer). However, that never gets *distributed* and the GPL only covers distribution rights. The question of whether or not something which *could* be linked into the kernel is a derived work is a very different question, and if taken too far, an advocate of this interpretation starts advocating something very close to interface copyrights --- something which I will note the FSF is passionately against when they called a boycott on companies such as Lotus many years ago. But this is very much off-topic for this list. I suggest that folks talk to Larry Rosen for his view on this issue, if they want a balanced counterpoint to that pushed by the FSF. - Ted - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/