Received: by 2002:a25:ad19:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id y25csp9923993ybi; Wed, 24 Jul 2019 12:24:36 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxvz0EaXJ0foQ8nQi88h42f2Mn213LFDm1rgFiLgfRJh9CuWu2igw7KSeUqnq+aVIFOv4oR X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:2488:: with SMTP id i8mr87429745pje.123.1563996276388; Wed, 24 Jul 2019 12:24:36 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1563996276; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=lUmjBsWKnWifdvIzjEstCDDikVLWBXVANDW3UoXai14TV6L03RFhdrbvSN21wOl4BT bRVbig/oeM1q64u/jyOYVMbQf9g7IcflTuMj9enbZeWTg9UXM2BsK8GOIjAfzoAO4ZkK gUkUSk5kcrTY++cs/lKtxgl8UqkqnfNky0tPbtKoHywOpJF46ZDOYv6tv8SaCxlYlEEj HzsVNsSoubW0N/QtXWMd8zoUscLxk+fgNKyL/8gT+wP7qIkePu0zykcSobaxFDp9Kil0 pFG3A9PUQOCLU3ld/aL1CN7TkIyoprcH6kwNv+nGS5pw27l4WisQjJjn6SL9Yow5yj6R fTfA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:from:subject:cc:to:message-id:date; bh=hMAelB93HEzeQY6JiOGjaE3+hw3Mh3yTG6VgyRiKjFo=; b=pxcgyMMl94ILuc8Lx3evAOPffBAlD0Snomf3G4NOU4yO5BMO/+zrepIlUVd/37lMBv 90QyqPkxAwBPss5GrDj+aO8TzGVZii4fT0ZkROPTwLykywgF01Nm1d1dkVU4eH6wYFXH xYrtAGPMmfECt0ZHaIa3del8ifjRFXjFZK5z95K1701WyTRUkSBFLQIh4eNPBSIU9vHe +BpGYu81jNA/c+VlHEXXs9a+yo6tlRTaLVvuyrYKBkhmALX7d8a2smvCuVMgyPgMpd+d s84PoIaNLoUpUamMME4J7Wdl4pI/KiUiRKAEndVIoZTFzW+4TDre3xAc/vV3zoN/lxuI MIgA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id t20si3353506pgv.580.2019.07.24.12.24.21; Wed, 24 Jul 2019 12:24:36 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727864AbfGXSM3 (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 24 Jul 2019 14:12:29 -0400 Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.9]:49410 "EHLO shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726298AbfGXSM3 (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Jul 2019 14:12:29 -0400 Received: from localhost (unknown [IPv6:2601:601:9f80:35cd::d71]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: davem-davemloft) by shards.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 69037154082D4; Wed, 24 Jul 2019 11:12:28 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2019 11:12:25 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <20190724.111225.2257475150626507655.davem@davemloft.net> To: ebiggers@kernel.org Cc: eric.dumazet@gmail.com, dvyukov@google.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, fw@strlen.de, i.maximets@samsung.com, edumazet@google.com, dsahern@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: Reminder: 99 open syzbot bugs in net subsystem From: David Miller In-Reply-To: <20190724163014.GC673@sol.localdomain> References: <20190724013813.GB643@sol.localdomain> <63f12327-dd4b-5210-4de2-705af6bc4ba4@gmail.com> <20190724163014.GC673@sol.localdomain> X-Mailer: Mew version 6.8 on Emacs 26.1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.12 (shards.monkeyblade.net [149.20.54.216]); Wed, 24 Jul 2019 11:12:28 -0700 (PDT) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Eric Biggers Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2019 09:30:14 -0700 > On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 08:39:05AM +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote: >> Some of the bugs have been fixed already, before syzbot found them. >> >> Why force human to be gentle to bots and actually replying to them ? >> >> I usually simply wait that syzbot is finding the bug does not repro anymore, >> but now if you send these emails, we will have even more pressure on us. >> > > First, based on experience, I'd guess about 30-45 of these are still valid. 17 > were seen in mainline in the last week, but some others are valid too. The ones > most likely to still be valid are at the beginning of the list. So let's try > not use the presence of outdated bugs as an excuse not to fix current bugs. So about half of the bugs we are to look at are already fixed and thus noise, even as estimated by you. I agree with Eric, these "reminders" are bad for the people you actually want to work on fixing these bugs. > Since the kernel community is basically in continuous bug bankruptcy and lots of I don't like this hyperbole. Please present facts and information we can actually use to improve the kernel development and bug fixing process. Thank you.