Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1030309AbVLFXp0 (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Dec 2005 18:45:26 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1030308AbVLFXp0 (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Dec 2005 18:45:26 -0500 Received: from mail.dvmed.net ([216.237.124.58]:41114 "EHLO mail.dvmed.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030306AbVLFXpZ (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Dec 2005 18:45:25 -0500 Message-ID: <43962281.2050707@pobox.com> Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2005 18:45:05 -0500 From: Jeff Garzik User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7-1.1.fc4 (X11/20050929) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "David S. Miller" CC: laforge@gnumonks.org, davej@redhat.com, jbenc@suse.cz, josejx@gentoo.org, mbuesch@freenet.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, bcm43xx-dev@lists.berlios.de, netdev@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Broadcom 43xx first results References: <4394902C.8060100@pobox.com> <20051205195329.GB19964@redhat.com> <20051206151046.GF4038@rama.exocore.com> <20051206.151919.72043193.davem@davemloft.net> In-Reply-To: <20051206.151919.72043193.davem@davemloft.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "srv2.dvmed.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: David S. Miller wrote: > I'm at the point where I frankly don't care which softmac > implementation we go with, but rather I'm more concerned that we pick > _ONE_ and just stick with it, and then adding the necessary interfaces > and infrastructure as different wireless devices require. > > Yes, you hear me right, it's more important to agree to one > implementation as the basis, even if it's the worst one currently. > Division of labor is something we simply cannot afford on the wireless > stack at this time. [...] Content analysis details: (0.1 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.1 RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL RBL: SORBS: sent directly from dynamic IP address [69.134.188.146 listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 779 Lines: 21 David S. Miller wrote: > I'm at the point where I frankly don't care which softmac > implementation we go with, but rather I'm more concerned that we pick > _ONE_ and just stick with it, and then adding the necessary interfaces > and infrastructure as different wireless devices require. > > Yes, you hear me right, it's more important to agree to one > implementation as the basis, even if it's the worst one currently. > Division of labor is something we simply cannot afford on the wireless > stack at this time. Agreed. Jeff - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/