Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 8 Oct 2001 19:24:20 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 8 Oct 2001 19:24:01 -0400 Received: from ns.suse.de ([213.95.15.193]:23305 "HELO Cantor.suse.de") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Mon, 8 Oct 2001 19:23:55 -0400 Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2001 01:24:18 +0200 (CEST) From: Dave Jones To: Alan Cox Cc: "David S. Miller" , , , , , Linus Torvalds , Linux Kernel Mailing List , , Subject: Re: [PATCH] change name of rep_nop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 9 Oct 2001, Alan Cox wrote: > That raises the question of whether x86 should seperate the "386" "486" .. > kernels by adding "Generic" for building a kernel that has all the work > arounds for everyones randomly buggy processors How do you propose to do this without turning setup.c and friends into a #ifdef nightmare ? setup_intel.c, setup_amd.c etc ?? Some of the bits I've planned for setup.c in 2.5 will make this look not so bad. Its grown quite large, and is continuing to do so as more and more vendors make more and more hardware bugs for us to work around. Splitting out things like the memory detection to a seperate file should bring this back down to a more sensible size. regards, Dave. -- | Dave Jones. http://www.suse.de/~davej | SuSE Labs - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/