Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932546AbVLGFaL (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Dec 2005 00:30:11 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932576AbVLGFaL (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Dec 2005 00:30:11 -0500 Received: from mail.kroah.org ([69.55.234.183]:61854 "EHLO perch.kroah.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932546AbVLGFaK (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Dec 2005 00:30:10 -0500 Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2005 21:29:43 -0800 From: Greg KH To: Coywolf Qi Hunt Cc: Tim Bird , Dave Airlie , David Woodhouse , arjan@infradead.org, andrew@walrond.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rms@gnu.org Subject: Re: Linux in a binary world... a doomsday scenario Message-ID: <20051207052943.GB21229@kroah.com> References: <21d7e9970512051610n1244467am12adc8373c1a4473@mail.gmail.com> <4394DA1D.3090007@am.sony.com> <20051206040820.GB26602@kroah.com> <2cd57c900512052358m5b631204i@mail.gmail.com> <20051206161131.GB2088@kroah.com> <2cd57c900512061738l2f19aa54x@mail.gmail.com> <20051207024000.GB19746@kroah.com> <2cd57c900512061923u1ce526c8p@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=unknown-8bit Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <2cd57c900512061923u1ce526c8p@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1864 Lines: 45 On Wed, Dec 07, 2005 at 11:23:37AM +0800, Coywolf Qi Hunt wrote: > 2005/12/7, Greg KH : > > On Wed, Dec 07, 2005 at 09:38:30AM +0800, Coywolf Qi Hunt wrote: > > > 2005/12/7, Greg KH : > > > > And no kernel developers are forcing anyone to use Linux. If they don't > > > > like it for whatever reasons, there are other alternatives... > > > > > > AFAIK, no proprietary software vendors are forcing any1 to buy their > > > proprietary software. Still you are speaking in a monopoly tone! > > > > How is the statement, "If you don't trust the intelligence of the Linux > > kernel developers, then don't use the Linux kernel." a monopolistic > > tone? > > The fact is Linux supports more hardware now. Some *BSD users turn to > Linux in order to drive their hardware for the _same_ reason as users > turn to windows. That is really a monopolistic position. No, not at all: mo·nop·o·ly Function: noun 1 : exclusive control of a particular market that is marked by the power to control prices and exclude competition and that esp. is developed willfully rather than as the result of superior products or skill. 2 : one that has a monopoly Source: Merriam-Webster's Dictionary of Law, © 1996 Merriam-Webster, Inc. I think our "superior product and skill" is what makes us not a monopoly :) Besides, the *BSD developers routinely use our code to write their own drivers (looking at how things are done) so in the end, having Linux support a device helps them out too. So the "exclude competition" portion of the above definition is also false... thanks, greg k-h - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/