Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932540AbVLGGJC (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Dec 2005 01:09:02 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932662AbVLGGJB (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Dec 2005 01:09:01 -0500 Received: from vms048pub.verizon.net ([206.46.252.48]:48849 "EHLO vms048pub.verizon.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932540AbVLGGJA (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Dec 2005 01:09:00 -0500 Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2005 01:08:58 -0500 From: Gene Heskett Subject: Re: ntp problems In-reply-to: <0E093DF2-A72F-4A76-9BF6-8D7E9B1AF31F@mac.com> To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Message-id: <200512070108.58466.gene.heskett@verizon.net> Organization: None, usuallly detectable by casual observers MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Content-disposition: inline References: <200512050031.39438.gene.heskett@verizon.net> <200512061622.54583.gene.heskett@verizon.net> <0E093DF2-A72F-4A76-9BF6-8D7E9B1AF31F@mac.com> User-Agent: KMail/1.7 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2556 Lines: 54 On Wednesday 07 December 2005 00:14, Kyle Moffett wrote: >On Dec 06, 2005, at 16:22, Gene Heskett wrote: >> That one installed without any hiccups, but I saw where the sign-on >> said it was DDR400 dual channel ram, whereas before the update it >> was DDR333 dual channel ram. As the XP2800 athlon isn't rated for >> DDR400, I backed into the bios and reset the fsb for 166 mhz which >> should give me a 333 >> fsb. But it still says DDR400 at signon. So I guess we'll see if >> its now stable at a 400 mhz fsb even if its set to 166/333. > >Hmm, this sounds a lot like the BIOS insanity we saw on one cheapo >Chaintech board. We knew it was bad when the thing reported in its >boot display that the CPU was an "Intel Athlon". Things only got >worse from there; but sadly there was no BIOS update, and we ended up >throwing away the $35 board just on general principles :-D. > Thats been my impression of anything wearing a chaintech label, and I cannot pin a reason on it, just 71 years of experience. Is that good enough? Dunno Kyle, but when shopping for a mobo, the chaintech stuff has always been bypassed. Some of the tech reports seem to say they're ok though. Another example of YMMV I guess. Anyway, I did finally get the bios to stop running the memory faster than an XP2800, rated at DDR333 can do. So after a couple of hard crashes, it seems to be back among the living. I had to use the expert group of settings though, & me not an expert, not 50 miles from home, nor am I carrying a briefcase as I once heard an expert described. And, acpi is on, and ntpd is happy with the new bios. Hurrah! >Cheers, >Kyle Moffett > >-- >There are two ways of constructing a software design. One way is to >make it so simple that there are obviously no deficiencies. And the >other way is to make it so complicated that there are no obvious >deficiencies. The first method is far more difficult. > -- C.A.R. Hoare -- Cheers, Gene "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order." -Ed Howdershelt (Author) 99.36% setiathome rank, not too shabby for a WV hillbilly Yahoo.com and AOL/TW attorneys please note, additions to the above message by Gene Heskett are: Copyright 2005 by Maurice Eugene Heskett, all rights reserved. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/