Received: by 2002:a25:ad19:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id y25csp10633239ybi; Thu, 25 Jul 2019 02:46:43 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxw/1pUBzzwnc88yetjh2DW0aMIatFTZ1H6Z5xWfIG5gxeeP6CnAk//cH9kLkcRLYYquKYA X-Received: by 2002:aa7:8dd2:: with SMTP id j18mr15541607pfr.88.1564048003480; Thu, 25 Jul 2019 02:46:43 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1564048003; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=oExn9/S31tuvEU6+BvS2L8+pkATx9FBDpU+bDJrKOHnKKkzczINxAIsGM75uSzqyqt Hwzup3XkmwGTxLn24aR25BfXwCEKaC8Wi5yfz9s4+VcvipS8cLO1cASAu+22rsvGdzNr Ikr4BN9T+IX3pN9GSbXaS4z5ZI1aL7kx8FTcJYrR2AqS68iVRecrfKQgJrrWMw7FRFJD dmUz1vutjH9nX/YQQE73mKVlF1AfRpbKSRtTS33paNTBBLgbT+iUad81Q+RuVBQD8HY5 u9EDHvHfxW4ZtQLnqeakrcWAMsDobX6Sq0XsCVKgY3UxDnN1L4YTxEcBTwku9ns5jBtW vPLQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:dkim-signature; bh=toD0+IbWe7oROYAV4KQZ3fPBvBGTw+vxAk94DklaQJU=; b=jWJhm9j7yQ0/l9ZfuqeAANcs3q22DqK7ROUFunIQ9uCyAFW3p+2u8uYU+ptJ10XqQb R5zuq4gYy9Mr+0cId/YhGPP5vtvijzzsf+J8GlqeF66bDoT2sUMhdUxBDvLG5rBDmNAu OI0qtcZMQRpp5FuPhrLCiR+xWvsOmYLWDl7dw/VWCUxt0jOFWCqjijD0GN1u1iRnxZX1 paXv9Y1A2y9tyiYRD3+m7eq7IRR0zb0ETWFlluRFi2vPPf+abz4lDzLQzWsCSZlg11tC CqDx0I/v7IoN56E6m6RveOmv6UzXwunv7o5rthEcO1ZT6zNR7pW5XSWUQl8aRf4e1gPX v5qg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@google.com header.s=20161025 header.b=UmW853Sm; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=google.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id j70si17278396pgd.500.2019.07.25.02.46.14; Thu, 25 Jul 2019 02:46:43 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@google.com header.s=20161025 header.b=UmW853Sm; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=google.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728753AbfGXVO2 (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 24 Jul 2019 17:14:28 -0400 Received: from mail-ot1-f66.google.com ([209.85.210.66]:42968 "EHLO mail-ot1-f66.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727868AbfGXVO2 (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Jul 2019 17:14:28 -0400 Received: by mail-ot1-f66.google.com with SMTP id l15so49362043otn.9 for ; Wed, 24 Jul 2019 14:14:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=toD0+IbWe7oROYAV4KQZ3fPBvBGTw+vxAk94DklaQJU=; b=UmW853SmyJJwlaFhE2REQrT7kuqxjg8L7RGjKhvHeM+Vu7J+SMiLrFMZcV2iHOuYG/ Xuf9A5VKAWr+jEy/9FrtH3c8/4krc4y8kP6grMucTNSh50zLdywUm9urfZRJzpvANxKc ckyeBqF1vUJi/PLVrBC5tXSw6BCeiJqSiQ9qP8XmTwnyZUNiwovt5aqfS/33OiGTOZgc 3+cAPx4ybW/XGY3q2KnCTwsxk0lZvKNBnC8x6zgc/WfKnYMFO1McUS9WcJOakPpTRswd BjRDHrcWVzYZVNk0xXBjMEouyWECEJTIONZJQZjFDQFpkYu5sUVdtbqUqPDE0ogD1eh8 opgQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=toD0+IbWe7oROYAV4KQZ3fPBvBGTw+vxAk94DklaQJU=; b=EkTmiWfsQ8RI3WdVIvubGckPmcJNRVH5SK3/2j5mXsKH5n8EJaU5Ae46DJXI/goDxR 0O5hhAh2KXmZwr9arw2TcKQV6DULzlWPllFtTIRptc+XoY2GdDpyYlxESuRf6pDHko3M vtYVclPBCNS/ERgrtqIb5+1a2krjNMahW3W15HKrYeOIRLJnb6gfWCsT7KMMDX91ocdy IcJSe8tt/Wui5QVNx6hRGPOpNzVSDqZ/H1dCuwAWV1Pqs8dMpAlEPClsgAedX5+uX+2f ZL9gbkD5S7/ljZfqbdDSFBf9eLVD20gsWTkChtWCg8LHFzlVaWxrYXgag4fNLc2y1dyH JzjA== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVmwZIsoHPYKcMfgQ04pU7yyNm2bj6TnmJ6fXvYXlIaRaXq7XVP oPESwlkSgtk7dWpGhwbfUlvtYlGTkJLZhbFmg1Q93A== X-Received: by 2002:a9d:6d06:: with SMTP id o6mr11855577otp.225.1564002865898; Wed, 24 Jul 2019 14:14:25 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20190724014222.110767-1-saravanak@google.com> <20190724014222.110767-4-saravanak@google.com> <41434f8279c7004737e19fe2fbad8f14@codeaurora.org> In-Reply-To: <41434f8279c7004737e19fe2fbad8f14@codeaurora.org> From: Saravana Kannan Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2019 14:13:45 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/5] OPP: Improve required-opps linking To: Sibi Sankar Cc: MyungJoo Ham , Kyungmin Park , Chanwoo Choi , Viresh Kumar , Nishanth Menon , Stephen Boyd , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Android Kernel Team , Linux PM , LKML , linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org : On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 10:59 AM Sibi Sankar wrote: > > Hey Saravana, > > Didn't get time to test v4 will > give it a spin tomorrow. Just > included some issues which should > still remain in v4. Thanks. > > On 2019-07-24 07:12, Saravana Kannan wrote: > > Currently, the linking of required-opps fails silently if the > > destination OPP table hasn't been added before the source OPP table is > > added. This puts an unnecessary requirement that the destination table > > be added before the source table is added. > > > > In reality, the destination table is needed only when we try to > > translate from source OPP to destination OPP. So, instead of > > completely failing, retry linking the tables when the translation is > > attempted. > > > > Signed-off-by: Saravana Kannan > > --- > > drivers/opp/core.c | 30 ++++++++++---- > > drivers/opp/of.c | 101 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------- > > drivers/opp/opp.h | 5 +++ > > 3 files changed, 80 insertions(+), 56 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/opp/core.c b/drivers/opp/core.c > > index 5460b7da110e..01c71d145ec7 100644 > > --- a/drivers/opp/core.c > > +++ b/drivers/opp/core.c > > @@ -706,6 +706,9 @@ static int _set_required_opps(struct device *dev, > > if (!required_opp_tables) > > return 0; > > > > + if (!_of_lazy_link_required_tables(opp_table)) > > + return -EPROBE_DEFER; > > + > > /* Single genpd case */ > > if (!genpd_virt_devs && required_opp_tables[0]->is_genpd) { > > pstate = likely(opp) ? opp->required_opps[0]->pstate : 0; > > @@ -726,11 +729,16 @@ static int _set_required_opps(struct device *dev, > > mutex_lock(&opp_table->genpd_virt_dev_lock); > > > > for (i = 0; i < opp_table->required_opp_count; i++) { > > - pstate = likely(opp) ? opp->required_opps[i]->pstate : 0; > > - > > if (!genpd_virt_devs[i]) > > continue; > > > > + if (!opp->required_opps[i]) { > > + ret = -ENODEV; > > + break; > > + } > > + > > + pstate = likely(opp) ? opp->required_opps[i]->pstate : 0; > > + > > ret = dev_pm_genpd_set_performance_state(genpd_virt_devs[i], > > pstate); > > if (ret) { > > dev_err(dev, "Failed to set performance rate of %s: %d (%d)\n", > > @@ -1906,8 +1914,11 @@ struct dev_pm_opp > > *dev_pm_opp_xlate_required_opp(struct opp_table *src_table, > > if (!src_table || !dst_table || !src_opp) > > return NULL; > > > > + _of_lazy_link_required_tables(src_table); > > + > > for (i = 0; i < src_table->required_opp_count; i++) { > > - if (src_table->required_opp_tables[i]->np == dst_table->np) > > + if (src_table->required_opp_tables[i] > > + && src_table->required_opp_tables[i]->np == dst_table->np) > > break; > > } > > > > @@ -1970,6 +1981,8 @@ int dev_pm_opp_xlate_performance_state(struct > > opp_table *src_table, > > if (!src_table->required_opp_count) > > return pstate; > > > > + _of_lazy_link_required_tables(src_table); > > + > > for (i = 0; i < src_table->required_opp_count; i++) { > > if (src_table->required_opp_tables[i]->np == dst_table->np) > > break; > > @@ -1985,15 +1998,16 @@ int dev_pm_opp_xlate_performance_state(struct > > opp_table *src_table, > > > > list_for_each_entry(opp, &src_table->opp_list, node) { > > if (opp->pstate == pstate) { > > - dest_pstate = opp->required_opps[i]->pstate; > > - goto unlock; > > + if (opp->required_opps[i]) > > + dest_pstate = opp->required_opps[i]->pstate; > > + break; > > } > > } > > > > - pr_err("%s: Couldn't find matching OPP (%p: %p)\n", __func__, > > src_table, > > - dst_table); > > + if (dest_pstate < 0) > > + pr_err("%s: Couldn't find matching OPP (%p: %p)\n", __func__, > > + src_table, dst_table); > > > > -unlock: > > mutex_unlock(&src_table->lock); > > > > return dest_pstate; > > diff --git a/drivers/opp/of.c b/drivers/opp/of.c > > index ff88eaf66b56..1f2860b2d6e5 100644 > > --- a/drivers/opp/of.c > > +++ b/drivers/opp/of.c > > @@ -145,7 +145,7 @@ static void _opp_table_free_required_tables(struct > > opp_table *opp_table) > > > > for (i = 0; i < opp_table->required_opp_count; i++) { > > if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(required_opp_tables[i])) > > - break; > > + continue; > > > > dev_pm_opp_put_opp_table(required_opp_tables[i]); > > } > > @@ -165,8 +165,8 @@ static void > > _opp_table_alloc_required_tables(struct opp_table *opp_table, > > struct device_node *opp_np) > > { > > struct opp_table **required_opp_tables; > > - struct device_node *required_np, *np; > > - int count, i; > > + struct device_node *np; > > + int count; > > > > /* Traversing the first OPP node is all we need */ > > np = of_get_next_available_child(opp_np, NULL); > > @@ -176,35 +176,65 @@ static void > > _opp_table_alloc_required_tables(struct opp_table *opp_table, > > } > > > > count = of_count_phandle_with_args(np, "required-opps", NULL); > > + of_node_put(np); > > if (!count) > > should this be count <= 0 instead ? Looks like in the current implementation of of_count_phandle_with_args() returns 0 if the required-opps property doesn't exist. It can return errors only if the phandles are invalid (hopefully DTC would catch that) or if the "cells" param is listed by the DT node doesn't have it. The later is not a problem here since cells is NULL. But I think what you suggested would be safer if the other error cases aren't caught by the DTC. But this is existing code and I don't want to fix unrelated stuff in this patch. > > - goto put_np; > > + return; > > > > required_opp_tables = kcalloc(count, sizeof(*required_opp_tables), > > GFP_KERNEL); > > if (!required_opp_tables) > > - goto put_np; > > + return; > > > > opp_table->required_opp_tables = required_opp_tables; > > opp_table->required_opp_count = count; > > error values could be assigned to > unsigned int member required_opp_count That's assuming a ~4GB kernel malloc succeeds :) Still a valid point, but don't want to fix that in this patch series. > > +} > > + > > +/* > > + * Try to link all required tables and return true if all of them have > > been > > + * linked. Otherwise, return false. > > + */ > > +bool _of_lazy_link_required_tables(struct opp_table *src) > > +{ > > + struct dev_pm_opp *src_opp, *tmp_opp; > > + struct opp_table *req_table; > > + struct device_node *req_np; > > + int i, num_linked = 0; > > > > - for (i = 0; i < count; i++) { > > - required_np = of_parse_required_opp(np, i); > > - if (!required_np) > > - goto free_required_tables; > > + mutex_lock(&src->lock); > > > > - required_opp_tables[i] = _find_table_of_opp_np(required_np); > > - of_node_put(required_np); > > + if (list_empty(&src->opp_list)) > > + goto out; > > > > - if (IS_ERR(required_opp_tables[i])) > > - goto free_required_tables; > > - } > > + src_opp = list_first_entry(&src->opp_list, struct dev_pm_opp, node); > > > > - goto put_np; > > + for (i = 0; i < src->required_opp_count; i++) { > > + if (src->required_opp_tables[i]) { > > + num_linked++; > > + continue; > > + } > > > > -free_required_tables: > > - _opp_table_free_required_tables(opp_table); > > -put_np: > > - of_node_put(np); > > + req_np = of_parse_required_opp(src_opp->np, i); > > + if (!req_np) > > + continue; > > + > > + req_table = _find_table_of_opp_np(req_np); > > + of_node_put(req_np); > > + if (!req_table) > > should be IS_ERR instead since > req_table could be ERR_PTR(-ENODEV) Will fix in the next version. > > > + continue; > > + > > + src->required_opp_tables[i] = req_table; > > + list_for_each_entry(tmp_opp, &src->opp_list, node) { > > + req_np = of_parse_required_opp(tmp_opp->np, i); > > + tmp_opp->required_opps[i] = _find_opp_of_np(req_table, > > + req_np); > > + of_node_put(req_np); > > + } > > + num_linked++; > > + } > > + > > +out: > > + mutex_unlock(&src->lock); > > + return num_linked == src->required_opp_count; > > } > > > > void _of_init_opp_table(struct opp_table *opp_table, struct device > > *dev, > > @@ -267,7 +297,7 @@ void _of_opp_free_required_opps(struct opp_table > > *opp_table, > > > > for (i = 0; i < opp_table->required_opp_count; i++) { > > if (!required_opps[i]) > > - break; > > + continue; > > > > /* Put the reference back */ > > dev_pm_opp_put(required_opps[i]); > > @@ -282,9 +312,7 @@ static int _of_opp_alloc_required_opps(struct > > opp_table *opp_table, > > struct dev_pm_opp *opp) > > { > > struct dev_pm_opp **required_opps; > > - struct opp_table *required_table; > > - struct device_node *np; > > - int i, ret, count = opp_table->required_opp_count; > > + int count = opp_table->required_opp_count; > > > > if (!count) > > return 0; > > @@ -295,32 +323,7 @@ static int _of_opp_alloc_required_opps(struct > > opp_table *opp_table, > > > > opp->required_opps = required_opps; > > > > - for (i = 0; i < count; i++) { > > - required_table = opp_table->required_opp_tables[i]; > > - > > - np = of_parse_required_opp(opp->np, i); > > - if (unlikely(!np)) { > > - ret = -ENODEV; > > - goto free_required_opps; > > - } > > - > > - required_opps[i] = _find_opp_of_np(required_table, np); > > - of_node_put(np); > > - > > - if (!required_opps[i]) { > > - pr_err("%s: Unable to find required OPP node: %pOF (%d)\n", > > - __func__, opp->np, i); > > - ret = -ENODEV; > > - goto free_required_opps; > > - } > > - } > > - > > return 0; > > - > > -free_required_opps: > > - _of_opp_free_required_opps(opp_table, opp); > > - > > - return ret; > > } > > > > static bool _opp_is_supported(struct device *dev, struct opp_table > > *opp_table, > > @@ -687,6 +690,8 @@ static int _of_add_opp_table_v2(struct device > > *dev, struct opp_table *opp_table) > > if (pstate_count) > > opp_table->genpd_performance_state = true; > > > > + _of_lazy_link_required_tables(opp_table); > > + > > opp_table->parsed_static_opps = true; > > > > return 0; > > diff --git a/drivers/opp/opp.h b/drivers/opp/opp.h > > index 01a500e2c40a..77e8394fd0fe 100644 > > --- a/drivers/opp/opp.h > > +++ b/drivers/opp/opp.h > > @@ -223,12 +223,17 @@ void _put_opp_list_kref(struct opp_table > > *opp_table); > > void _of_init_opp_table(struct opp_table *opp_table, struct device > > *dev, int index); > > void _of_clear_opp_table(struct opp_table *opp_table); > > struct opp_table *_managed_opp(struct device *dev, int index); > > +bool _of_lazy_link_required_tables(struct opp_table *src); > > void _of_opp_free_required_opps(struct opp_table *opp_table, > > struct dev_pm_opp *opp); > > #else > > static inline void _of_init_opp_table(struct opp_table *opp_table, > > struct device *dev, int index) {} > > static inline void _of_clear_opp_table(struct opp_table *opp_table) {} > > static inline struct opp_table *_managed_opp(struct device *dev, int > > index) { return NULL; } > > +bool _of_lazy_link_required_tables(struct opp_table *src) > > should be static inline bool Thanks. Good catch. > > > +{ > > + return true; > > +} > > static inline void _of_opp_free_required_opps(struct opp_table > > *opp_table, > > struct dev_pm_opp *opp) {} > > #endif > I'll send out a v5 series after Viresh takes a look at this and confirms this design is okay. -Saravana