Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: arm64: Update kvm_arm_exception_class and
 esr_class_str for new EC
To:     Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>
Cc:     marc.zyngier@arm.com, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
        will@kernel.org, julien.thierry@arm.com, suzuki.poulose@arm.com,
        mark.rutland@arm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        amit.kachhap@arm.com, Dave.Martin@arm.com,
        wanghaibin.wang@huawei.com
References: <1562992854-972-1-git-send-email-yuzenghui@huawei.com>
From:   James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
Message-ID: <e009aceb-9d23-1a58-8186-4883ab98bd45@arm.com>
Date:   Thu, 25 Jul 2019 13:48:38 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux aarch64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/60.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <1562992854-972-1-git-send-email-yuzenghui@huawei.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-GB
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Hi,

On 13/07/2019 05:40, Zenghui Yu wrote:
> We've added two ESR exception classes for new ARM hardware extensions:
> ESR_ELx_EC_PAC and ESR_ELx_EC_SVE.
> 
> This patch updates "kvm_arm_exception_class" for these two EC, which the

> new EC will be parsed in kvm_exit trace events (for guest's usage of

new EC will be visible to user-space via kvm_exit() trace events... ?


> Pointer Authentication and Scalable Vector Extension).  The same updates
> to "esr_class_str" for ESR_ELx_EC_PAC, by which we can get more accurate
> debug info.

Its accurate either way round. This stops the trace-point print from printing the EC in
hex, instead giving it a name, like we do for all the others.


>  Trivial changes, update them in one go.

(I don't think this bit needs to go in the git-log!)


> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_arm.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_arm.h
> index a8b205e..ddf9d76 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_arm.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_arm.h
> @@ -316,9 +316,10 @@
>  
>  #define kvm_arm_exception_class \
>  	ECN(UNKNOWN), ECN(WFx), ECN(CP15_32), ECN(CP15_64), ECN(CP14_MR), \
> -	ECN(CP14_LS), ECN(FP_ASIMD), ECN(CP10_ID), ECN(CP14_64), ECN(SVC64), \
> -	ECN(HVC64), ECN(SMC64), ECN(SYS64), ECN(IMP_DEF), ECN(IABT_LOW), \
> -	ECN(IABT_CUR), ECN(PC_ALIGN), ECN(DABT_LOW), ECN(DABT_CUR), \
> +	ECN(CP14_LS), ECN(FP_ASIMD), ECN(CP10_ID), ECN(PAC), ECN(CP14_64), \
> +	ECN(SVC64), ECN(HVC64), ECN(SMC64), ECN(SYS64), ECN(SVE), \
> +	ECN(IMP_DEF), ECN(IABT_LOW), ECN(IABT_CUR), \
> +	ECN(PC_ALIGN), ECN(DABT_LOW), ECN(DABT_CUR), \
>  	ECN(SP_ALIGN), ECN(FP_EXC32), ECN(FP_EXC64), ECN(SERROR), \
>  	ECN(BREAKPT_LOW), ECN(BREAKPT_CUR), ECN(SOFTSTP_LOW), \
>  	ECN(SOFTSTP_CUR), ECN(WATCHPT_LOW), ECN(WATCHPT_CUR), \

Do we need to add:
ESR_ELx_EC_ILL
ESR_ELx_EC_HVC32
ESR_ELx_EC_SMC32


(I don't see how any of the _CUR entries could ever happen as these EC originally come
from ESR_EL2, but they're harmless)


> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c
> index 8c03456..969e156 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c
> @@ -734,6 +734,7 @@ asmlinkage void __exception do_sysinstr(unsigned int esr, struct pt_regs *regs)
>  	[ESR_ELx_EC_CP14_LS]		= "CP14 LDC/STC",
>  	[ESR_ELx_EC_FP_ASIMD]		= "ASIMD",
>  	[ESR_ELx_EC_CP10_ID]		= "CP10 MRC/VMRS",
> +	[ESR_ELx_EC_PAC]		= "PAC",
>  	[ESR_ELx_EC_CP14_64]		= "CP14 MCRR/MRRC",
>  	[ESR_ELx_EC_ILL]		= "PSTATE.IL",
>  	[ESR_ELx_EC_SVC32]		= "SVC (AArch32)",


Reviewed-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>


Thanks,

James