Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750773AbVLGKYf (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Dec 2005 05:24:35 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750796AbVLGKYf (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Dec 2005 05:24:35 -0500 Received: from ns.ustc.edu.cn ([202.38.64.1]:34743 "EHLO mx1.ustc.edu.cn") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750773AbVLGKYY (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Dec 2005 05:24:24 -0500 Message-Id: <20051207105035.516042000@localhost.localdomain> References: <20051207104755.177435000@localhost.localdomain> Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2005 18:48:02 +0800 From: Wu Fengguang To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Andrew Morton , Christoph Lameter , Rik van Riel , Peter Zijlstra , Marcelo Tosatti , Magnus Damm , Nick Piggin , Andrea Arcangeli Subject: [PATCH 07/16] mm: balance active/inactive list scan rates Content-Disposition: inline; filename=mm-balance-active-inactive-list-aging.patch Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 9641 Lines: 293 shrink_zone() has two major design goals: 1) let active/inactive lists have equal scan rates 2) do the scans in small chunks But the implementation has some problems: - reluctant to scan small zones the callers often have to dip into low priority to free memory. - the balance is quite rough the break statement in the loop breaks it. - may scan few pages in one batch refill_inactive_zone can be called twice to scan 32 and 1 pages. The new design: 1) keep perfect balance let active_list follow inactive_list in scan rate 2) always scan in SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX sized chunks simple and efficient 3) will scan at least one chunk the expected behavior from the callers The perfect balance may or may not yield better performance, though it a) is a more understandable and dependable behavior b) together with inter-zone balancing, makes the zoned memories consistent The atomic reclaim_in_progress is there to prevent most concurrent reclaims. If concurrent reclaims did happen, there will be no fatal errors. I tested the patch with the following commands: dd if=/dev/zero of=hot bs=1M seek=800 count=1 dd if=/dev/zero of=cold bs=1M seek=50000 count=1 ./test-aging.sh; ./active-inactive-aging-rate.sh Before the patch: ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- active/inactive sizes on 2.6.14-2-686-smp: 0/1000 = 0 / 1241 563/1000 = 73343 / 130108 887/1000 = 137348 / 154816 active/inactive scan rates: dma 38/1000 = 7731 / (198924 + 0) normal 465/1000 = 2979780 / (6394740 + 0) high 680/1000 = 4354230 / (6396786 + 0) total used free shared buffers cached Mem: 2027 1978 49 0 4 1923 -/+ buffers/cache: 49 1977 Swap: 0 0 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- After the patch, the scan rates and the size ratios are kept roughly the same for all zones: ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- active/inactive sizes on 2.6.15-rc3-mm1: 0/1000 = 0 / 961 236/1000 = 38385 / 162429 319/1000 = 70607 / 221101 active/inactive scan rates: dma 0/1000 = 0 / (42176 + 0) normal 234/1000 = 1714688 / (7303456 + 1088) high 317/1000 = 3151936 / (9933792 + 96) total used free shared buffers cached Mem: 2020 1969 50 0 5 1908 -/+ buffers/cache: 54 1965 Swap: 0 0 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- script test-aging.sh: ------------------------------ #!/bin/zsh cp cold /dev/null& while {pidof cp > /dev/null}; do cp hot /dev/null done ------------------------------ script active-inactive-aging-rate.sh: ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- #!/bin/sh echo active/inactive sizes on `uname -r`: egrep '(active|inactive)' /proc/zoneinfo | while true do read name value [[ -z $name ]] && break eval $name=$value [[ $name = "inactive" ]] && echo -e "$((active * 1000 / (1 + inactive)))/1000 \t= $active / $inactive" done while true do read name value [[ -z $name ]] && break eval $name=$value done < /proc/vmstat echo echo active/inactive scan rates: echo -e "dma \t $((pgrefill_dma * 1000 / (1 + pgscan_kswapd_dma + pgscan_direct_dma)))/1000 \t= $pgrefill_dma / ($pgscan_kswapd_dma + $pgscan_direct_dma)" echo -e "normal \t $((pgrefill_normal * 1000 / (1 + pgscan_kswapd_normal + pgscan_direct_normal)))/1000 \t= $pgrefill_normal / ($pgscan_kswapd_normal + $pgscan_direct_normal)" echo -e "high \t $((pgrefill_high * 1000 / (1 + pgscan_kswapd_high + pgscan_direct_high)))/1000 \t= $pgrefill_high / ($pgscan_kswapd_high + $pgscan_direct_high)" echo free -m ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Signed-off-by: Wu Fengguang --- include/linux/mmzone.h | 3 -- include/linux/swap.h | 2 - mm/page_alloc.c | 5 +--- mm/vmscan.c | 52 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------- 4 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-) --- linux.orig/mm/vmscan.c +++ linux/mm/vmscan.c @@ -912,7 +912,7 @@ static void shrink_cache(struct zone *zo int nr_scan; int nr_freed; - nr_taken = isolate_lru_pages(sc->swap_cluster_max, + nr_taken = isolate_lru_pages(sc->nr_to_scan, &zone->inactive_list, &page_list, &nr_scan); zone->nr_inactive -= nr_taken; @@ -1106,56 +1106,56 @@ refill_inactive_zone(struct zone *zone, /* * This is a basic per-zone page freer. Used by both kswapd and direct reclaim. + * The reclaim process: + * a) scan always in batch of SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX pages + * b) scan inactive list at least one batch + * c) balance the scan rate of active/inactive list + * d) finish on either scanned or reclaimed enough pages */ static void shrink_zone(struct zone *zone, struct scan_control *sc) { + unsigned long long next_scan_active; unsigned long nr_active; unsigned long nr_inactive; atomic_inc(&zone->reclaim_in_progress); + next_scan_active = sc->nr_scanned; + /* * Add one to `nr_to_scan' just to make sure that the kernel will * slowly sift through the active list. */ - zone->nr_scan_active += (zone->nr_active >> sc->priority) + 1; - nr_active = zone->nr_scan_active; - if (nr_active >= sc->swap_cluster_max) - zone->nr_scan_active = 0; - else - nr_active = 0; - - zone->nr_scan_inactive += (zone->nr_inactive >> sc->priority) + 1; - nr_inactive = zone->nr_scan_inactive; - if (nr_inactive >= sc->swap_cluster_max) - zone->nr_scan_inactive = 0; - else - nr_inactive = 0; + nr_active = zone->nr_scan_active + 1; + nr_inactive = (zone->nr_inactive >> sc->priority) + SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX; + nr_inactive &= ~(SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX - 1); + sc->nr_to_scan = SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX; sc->nr_to_reclaim = sc->swap_cluster_max; - while (nr_active || nr_inactive) { - if (nr_active) { - sc->nr_to_scan = min(nr_active, - (unsigned long)sc->swap_cluster_max); - nr_active -= sc->nr_to_scan; + while (nr_active >= SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX * 1024 || nr_inactive) { + if (nr_active >= SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX * 1024) { + nr_active -= SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX * 1024; refill_inactive_zone(zone, sc); } if (nr_inactive) { - sc->nr_to_scan = min(nr_inactive, - (unsigned long)sc->swap_cluster_max); - nr_inactive -= sc->nr_to_scan; + nr_inactive -= SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX; shrink_cache(zone, sc); if (sc->nr_to_reclaim <= 0) break; } } - throttle_vm_writeout(); + next_scan_active = (sc->nr_scanned - next_scan_active) * 1024ULL * + (unsigned long long)zone->nr_active; + do_div(next_scan_active, zone->nr_inactive | 1); + zone->nr_scan_active = nr_active + (unsigned long)next_scan_active; atomic_dec(&zone->reclaim_in_progress); + + throttle_vm_writeout(); } /* @@ -1196,6 +1196,9 @@ shrink_caches(struct zone **zones, struc if (zone->all_unreclaimable && sc->priority < DEF_PRIORITY) continue; /* Let kswapd poll it */ + if (atomic_read(&zone->reclaim_in_progress)) + continue; + /* * Balance page aging in local zones and following headless * zones. @@ -1425,6 +1428,9 @@ scan_swspd: if (zone->all_unreclaimable && priority != DEF_PRIORITY) continue; + if (atomic_read(&zone->reclaim_in_progress)) + continue; + zone->temp_priority = priority; if (zone->prev_priority > priority) zone->prev_priority = priority; --- linux.orig/mm/page_alloc.c +++ linux/mm/page_alloc.c @@ -2145,7 +2145,6 @@ static void __init free_area_init_core(s INIT_LIST_HEAD(&zone->active_list); INIT_LIST_HEAD(&zone->inactive_list); zone->nr_scan_active = 0; - zone->nr_scan_inactive = 0; zone->nr_active = 0; zone->nr_inactive = 0; zone->aging_total = 0; @@ -2301,7 +2300,7 @@ static int zoneinfo_show(struct seq_file "\n inactive %lu" "\n aging %lu" "\n age %lu" - "\n scanned %lu (a: %lu i: %lu)" + "\n scanned %lu (a: %lu)" "\n spanned %lu" "\n present %lu", zone->free_pages, @@ -2313,7 +2312,7 @@ static int zoneinfo_show(struct seq_file zone->aging_total, zone->page_age, zone->pages_scanned, - zone->nr_scan_active, zone->nr_scan_inactive, + zone->nr_scan_active / 1024, zone->spanned_pages, zone->present_pages); seq_printf(m, --- linux.orig/include/linux/swap.h +++ linux/include/linux/swap.h @@ -111,7 +111,7 @@ enum { SWP_SCANNING = (1 << 8), /* refcount in scan_swap_map */ }; -#define SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX 32 +#define SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX 32 /* must be power of 2 */ #define SWAP_MAP_MAX 0x7fff #define SWAP_MAP_BAD 0x8000 --- linux.orig/include/linux/mmzone.h +++ linux/include/linux/mmzone.h @@ -142,8 +142,7 @@ struct zone { spinlock_t lru_lock; struct list_head active_list; struct list_head inactive_list; - unsigned long nr_scan_active; - unsigned long nr_scan_inactive; + unsigned long nr_scan_active; /* x1024 to be more precise */ unsigned long nr_active; unsigned long nr_inactive; unsigned long pages_scanned; /* since last reclaim */ -- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/