Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] power/supply/powersupply_sysfs: Add of_node name to
 uevent message if available
To:     Richard Tresidder <rtresidd@electromag.com.au>, sre@kernel.org,
        enric.balletbo@collabora.com, ncrews@chromium.org,
        andrew.smirnov@gmail.com, groeck@chromium.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
        linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
References: <1564040858-24202-1-git-send-email-rtresidd@electromag.com.au>
From:   David Lechner <david@lechnology.com>
Message-ID: <9a10b934-e7f3-c95f-6250-8a857bdfa912@lechnology.com>
Date:   Thu, 25 Jul 2019 09:08:28 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/60.7.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <1564040858-24202-1-git-send-email-rtresidd@electromag.com.au>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On 7/25/19 2:47 AM, Richard Tresidder wrote:
> If the of_node name of the supply is available from the devicetree binding
> then include it under the var POWER_SUPPLY_OF_NODE_NAME.
> This helps where a consistent name is known via the device tree binding
> but it is hard to identify based on the usual enumeration process.
> 

Would it be possible to use of_device_uevent() instead of introducing a new
property?