Received: by 2002:a25:ad19:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id y25csp11230159ybi; Thu, 25 Jul 2019 12:18:48 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqy5Pk1jVMF/YjDLZXk7zNGH2gs0ALMnK/KKZkr9b0fz6zBbJ5uP2O4YsGEnzVGrPuRRze0I X-Received: by 2002:aa7:8acb:: with SMTP id b11mr17596808pfd.109.1564082328256; Thu, 25 Jul 2019 12:18:48 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1564082328; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=pRThhW8hfV3PuRA3b8RGPAeVb8vF25MOejt3wxlb6YI1bsLV5A8U4PJM84KwjbmGeq SErb3qSdOsKH+fi3NouYScq+H6zEa1AhHdKi9nn+ci09GsNeChzi7l45lAnsoNQFQAZx Gh0r2Z9JDE2Ba5g3px0tNHiqGZNo5aB2YsfP7QIuQXTtndx9hqJ4uOSSZfG5a/T/qmhW oINOTKz7IoOszzTnMpMr0EqQf7xWNZ0vYCI72BPoT8qtqH91kwmlTvk8czjuPFTeSYsI wGHlI1dpun0ksUaRee/cAJ1pQtTvhXnOr8yaRiaRaNRmd3R/hmWtHOJvApZ1+j8sSjGT UJsg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:subject:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:from:references:cc:to; bh=ZOFIkfQ7gPQSO6Y0wd9MmAH2p2iR9tuPGwhcwO3X9t8=; b=rrD14Z3gTBARrTvFZDJqLp7eMa7KTK9hepQ3Ne752byezFhh20EwEeO2KFUdO5WPuZ gyMtuMIDh8Rd8+9xWYY9Wmie7Eet0KPdErh/4RfGb4DvY8tyb1YbZNFg2ZfBbxT59n2N aLVnZg/lPbvb0fY73rVM/3/WkG/HTQuW1NG+vqEqF6HSmdy1wpLkUwBM31HUPBknZTf2 ZkWAgKHrFgOxGeNFYnWGhoL9YdidwSJRYcfCyxMX0NuRd/qMEUTvGj1He+u6tv3mSDEs 1Q5VxcujyBJ8PtpCFdP9kaBCQVz4a7EwrBrKJAqsf5etD4I5qRVrt0FR5EaQT6Is5juw jKfg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 97si18252670ple.161.2019.07.25.12.18.32; Thu, 25 Jul 2019 12:18:48 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726830AbfGYTRS (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 25 Jul 2019 15:17:18 -0400 Received: from ale.deltatee.com ([207.54.116.67]:42248 "EHLO ale.deltatee.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726736AbfGYTRR (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Jul 2019 15:17:17 -0400 Received: from s01061831bf6ec98c.cg.shawcable.net ([68.147.80.180] helo=[192.168.6.132]) by ale.deltatee.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hqjEe-0003mV-J9; Thu, 25 Jul 2019 13:17:05 -0600 To: Jason Gunthorpe Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org" , Bjorn Helgaas , Christoph Hellwig , Christian Koenig , Sagi Grimberg , Keith Busch , Jens Axboe , Dan Williams , Eric Pilmore , Stephen Bates References: <20190722230859.5436-1-logang@deltatee.com> <20190722230859.5436-12-logang@deltatee.com> <20190725185830.GH7450@mellanox.com> From: Logan Gunthorpe Message-ID: Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2019 13:17:02 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20190725185830.GH7450@mellanox.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 68.147.80.180 X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: sbates@raithlin.com, epilmore@gigaio.com, dan.j.williams@intel.com, axboe@fb.com, kbusch@kernel.org, sagi@grimberg.me, Christian.Koenig@amd.com, hch@lst.de, bhelgaas@google.com, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jgg@mellanox.com X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: logang@deltatee.com X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on ale.deltatee.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00, GREYLIST_ISWHITE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/14] PCI/P2PDMA: dma_map P2PDMA map requests that traverse the host bridge X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Tue, 02 Aug 2016 21:08:31 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on ale.deltatee.com) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2019-07-25 12:58 p.m., Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 05:08:56PM -0600, Logan Gunthorpe wrote: >> Any requests that traverse the host bridge will need to be mapped into >> the IOMMU, so call dma_map_sg() inside pci_p2pdma_map_sg() when >> appropriate. >> >> Similarly, call dma_unmap_sg() inside pci_p2pdma_unmap_sg(). >> >> Signed-off-by: Logan Gunthorpe >> drivers/pci/p2pdma.c | 31 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- >> 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/pci/p2pdma.c b/drivers/pci/p2pdma.c >> index 5f43f92f9336..76f51678342c 100644 >> +++ b/drivers/pci/p2pdma.c >> @@ -830,8 +830,22 @@ int pci_p2pdma_map_sg_attrs(struct device *dev, struct scatterlist *sg, >> int nents, enum dma_data_direction dir, unsigned long attrs) >> { >> struct dev_pagemap *pgmap = sg_page(sg)->pgmap; >> + struct pci_dev *client; >> + int dist; >> + >> + client = find_parent_pci_dev(dev); >> + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!client)) >> + return 0; >> >> - return __pci_p2pdma_map_sg(pgmap, dev, sg, nents); >> + dist = upstream_bridge_distance(pgmap->pci_p2pdma_provider, >> + client, NULL); >> + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(dist & P2PDMA_NOT_SUPPORTED)) >> + return 0; >> + >> + if (dist & P2PDMA_THRU_HOST_BRIDGE) >> + return dma_map_sg_attrs(dev, sg, nents, dir, attrs); > > IIRC at this point the SG will have struct page references to the BAR > memory - so (all?) the IOMMU drivers are able to handle P2P setup in > this case? Yes. The IOMMU drivers refer to the physical address for BAR which they can get from the struct page. And this works fine today. > Didn't you also have a patch to remove the struct page's for the BAR > memory? Well that was an RFC that's not going anywhere in it's current form. I'd still like to remove struct pages but that's going to take a while and when that happens, this will have to be reworked. Probably to use dma_map_resource() instead but will depend on the form the removal takes. Logan