Received: by 2002:a25:ad19:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id y25csp11393543ybi; Thu, 25 Jul 2019 15:39:33 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzaGOodnlCiTlLZw265fjk1UHVCBQlRpVnKvVur5m0GSOXp0cu9wMnrtweT7drw98sKCtgG X-Received: by 2002:a62:3883:: with SMTP id f125mr19075453pfa.258.1564094373725; Thu, 25 Jul 2019 15:39:33 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1564094373; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=Z0UxYBDg6SQckDW8HsHMPp0RsAZtXiyjlwxGnjAJ7a03h7a4W6F/wXMHuPFXqLeX5f yJopgTnIelJ3xjyrejLcuCh8qYsmHQwaNnuQRgD2nhdBOFevJgU0kWXQgl+cADgC/y41 nbKxqJmGT8SZTOX+HXxOvbrM9quBR7t91cg5pJzWpI/i75kXf65ReErBcSmZdiYyEUi0 /v32V3AE9FiOlpx5vwgdQTuDujSO2D86xI4NXBYbUPaC6M8MhU6eeaNYy5GCQCSm8MYE VbMhxaqEgM2nyhNktpp4kmWLUQaW+PsFc3LTlJa8OhT22advSIxKuzyivmbmpD1xtb81 Xk1w== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:mime-version:user-agent:references :message-id:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=imL+1F0XzR5OM3IO0zzcBp7nD0bUD6w8WorLpBvUE0Q=; b=MiXzPaQYdZ87gkf3sh/JZmRYbzrgXJJzklGBKjRL8zDcxifd105hwV26nsKEpzoBnl Wi7zPWbwO+DcjmIwEwR9iMbTtjIkwhLO+kzzNX9jhvF3/oqGBQKcD/vohF9zRkBIkBmh Qsd12+ZVmAqkg2v5hIz1Zvu80UkYhjIkvidYvY7qeBOxsCVubWExIsHVunh+hXcjlGCl X5ZIFAjcw4fgiUQXms7E/KFcP/BuuzKvi5ddauIiOARn0ezx7nSTsQtWoImJwMaWDWft y//TIkb616CmgsrsOLPiPovwgOHeBxlK867tbZdp7hmn7hJXcvSV3aLFg6JwAMWqQ5Il U6YA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id p44si18212323pjp.0.2019.07.25.15.39.18; Thu, 25 Jul 2019 15:39:33 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726846AbfGYWiL (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 25 Jul 2019 18:38:11 -0400 Received: from Galois.linutronix.de ([193.142.43.55]:47877 "EHLO Galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726704AbfGYWiK (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Jul 2019 18:38:10 -0400 Received: from pd9ef1cb8.dip0.t-ipconnect.de ([217.239.28.184] helo=nanos) by Galois.linutronix.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1hqmN6-0006FH-Aa; Fri, 26 Jul 2019 00:38:00 +0200 Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2019 00:37:59 +0200 (CEST) From: Thomas Gleixner To: "H. Peter Anvin" cc: John Hubbard , john.hubbard@gmail.com, Ingo Molnar , Borislav Petkov , x86@kernel.org, LKML Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] x86/boot: clear some fields explicitly In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <20190724231528.32381-1-jhubbard@nvidia.com> <20190724231528.32381-2-jhubbard@nvidia.com> <345add60-de4a-73b1-0445-127738c268b4@nvidia.com> <3DFA2707-89A6-4DD2-8DFB-0C2D1ABA1B3C@zytor.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.21 (DEB 202 2017-01-01) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Linutronix-Spam-Score: -1.0 X-Linutronix-Spam-Level: - X-Linutronix-Spam-Status: No , -1.0 points, 5.0 required, ALL_TRUSTED=-1,SHORTCIRCUIT=-0.0001 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 25 Jul 2019, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > On 7/25/19 3:03 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > On Thu, 25 Jul 2019, hpa@zytor.com wrote: > >> On July 25, 2019 2:48:30 PM PDT, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > >>> > >>> But seriously I think it's not completely insane what they are doing > >>> and the table based approach is definitely more readable and maintainable > >>> than the existing stuff. > >> > >> Doing this table based does seem like a good idea. > > > > The question is whether we use a 'toclear' table or a 'preserve' table. I'd > > argue that the 'preserve' approach is saner. > > > I agree. Now we just need to volunteer someone to do that :) > >> Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. > > > > I surely excuse the brevity, but the formatting mess which that brevity app > > creates is not excusable. > > > > I'll try to improve it... SCNR ...