Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] power/supply/powersupply_sysfs: Add of_node name to
 uevent message if available
To:     David Lechner <david@lechnology.com>, sre@kernel.org,
        enric.balletbo@collabora.com, ncrews@chromium.org,
        andrew.smirnov@gmail.com, groeck@chromium.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
        linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
References: <1564040858-24202-1-git-send-email-rtresidd@electromag.com.au>
 <9a10b934-e7f3-c95f-6250-8a857bdfa912@lechnology.com>
From:   Richard Tresidder <rtresidd@electromag.com.au>
Message-ID: <3c372ca4-373d-9c03-8636-a9f065eed577@electromag.com.au>
Date:   Fri, 26 Jul 2019 10:40:28 +0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/60.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <9a10b934-e7f3-c95f-6250-8a857bdfa912@lechnology.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Language: en-AU
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Hi David
   That it would be. I wasn't aware of that call.
I'll give it a crack and send in a new version of the patch.

Cheers
   Richard Tresidder

Richard Tresidder
On 25/07/2019 10:08 pm, David Lechner wrote:
> On 7/25/19 2:47 AM, Richard Tresidder wrote:
>> If the of_node name of the supply is available from the devicetree 
>> binding
>> then include it under the var POWER_SUPPLY_OF_NODE_NAME.
>> This helps where a consistent name is known via the device tree binding
>> but it is hard to identify based on the usual enumeration process.
>>
>
> Would it be possible to use of_device_uevent() instead of introducing 
> a new
> property?
>
>
>