Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751151AbVLGPob (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Dec 2005 10:44:31 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751152AbVLGPoa (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Dec 2005 10:44:30 -0500 Received: from bay103-f16.bay103.hotmail.com ([65.54.174.26]:11207 "EHLO hotmail.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751151AbVLGPoa (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Dec 2005 10:44:30 -0500 Message-ID: X-Originating-IP: [68.252.185.41] X-Originating-Email: [dravet@hotmail.com] From: "Jason Dravet" To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: wrong number of serial port detected Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2005 09:44:29 -0600 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed X-OriginalArrivalTime: 07 Dec 2005 15:44:29.0870 (UTC) FILETIME=[1C756CE0:01C5FB45] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1049 Lines: 23 Hello, I have a question about the way serial ports are detected. Since I started using udev last year I noticed 32 ttySxx nodes in my /dev directory. I checked dmesg and the serial port driver was detecting 32 ports. Here is the line from dmesg: Serial: 8250/16550 driver $Revision: 1.90 $ 32 ports, IRQ sharing enabled In fact I don't have 32 ports. I have two serial ports on the motherboard, both of which are disabled in the BIOS. I opened a bug in RedHat's bugzilla system and it was promptly closed saying this was unfixable. I was told that the kernel loaded the maximum number of ports supported by the serial port driver. I asked why and I have not received a response. So I ask this mailing list Can the kernel detect the proper number of serial ports or not? Thanks, Jason - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/