Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Fri, 26 Jul 2019 15:30:02 +0200
From:   luca abeni <luca.abeni@santannapisa.it>
To:     Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
Cc:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
        Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
        Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>,
        Valentin Schneider <Valentin.Schneider@arm.com>,
        Qais Yousef <Qais.Yousef@arm.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] sched/deadline: Fix double accounting of rq/running
 bw in push_dl_task()
Message-ID: <20190726153002.5e49c666@sweethome>
In-Reply-To: <20190726082756.5525-2-dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
References: <20190726082756.5525-1-dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
        <20190726082756.5525-2-dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Hi,

On Fri, 26 Jul 2019 09:27:52 +0100
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com> wrote:
[...]
> @@ -2121,17 +2121,13 @@ static int push_dl_task(struct rq *rq)
>  	}
>  
>  	deactivate_task(rq, next_task, 0);
> -	sub_running_bw(&next_task->dl, &rq->dl);
> -	sub_rq_bw(&next_task->dl, &rq->dl);
>  	set_task_cpu(next_task, later_rq->cpu);
> -	add_rq_bw(&next_task->dl, &later_rq->dl);
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * Update the later_rq clock here, because the clock is used
>  	 * by the cpufreq_update_util() inside __add_running_bw().
>  	 */
>  	update_rq_clock(later_rq);
> -	add_running_bw(&next_task->dl, &later_rq->dl);

Looking at the code again and thinking a little bit more about this
issue, I suspect a similar change is needed in pull_dl_task() too, no?


			Luca