Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751484AbVLGR5L (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Dec 2005 12:57:11 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751569AbVLGR5L (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Dec 2005 12:57:11 -0500 Received: from mx2.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.151.9]:19595 "EHLO mx2.mail.elte.hu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751484AbVLGR5K (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Dec 2005 12:57:10 -0500 Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2005 18:57:08 +0100 From: Ingo Molnar To: Roman Zippel Cc: Thomas Gleixner , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton , rostedt@goodmis.org, johnstul@us.ibm.com Subject: Re: [patch 00/21] hrtimer - High-resolution timer subsystem Message-ID: <20051207175708.GA3672@elte.hu> References: <20051206000126.589223000@tglx.tec.linutronix.de> <1133908082.16302.93.camel@tglx.tec.linutronix.de> <20051207165550.GA2426@elte.hu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-ELTE-SpamScore: -1.6 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-1.6 required=5.9 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.0.3 -2.8 ALL_TRUSTED Did not pass through any untrusted hosts 1.2 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1386 Lines: 40 * Roman Zippel wrote: > > > (It's also interesting how you do that without giving me any > > > credit for it.) > > > > Sorry if it was previously your idea and if we didnt credit you for > > it. > > [...] > > > > > A bit later ktime_t looked pretty much like the 64bit part of my > > > ktimespec. > > > > and Thomas credited you for that point in his announcement: > > > > " Roman pointed out that the penalty for some architectures > > would be quite big when using the nsec_t (64bit) scalar time > > storage format. " > > "pointed out that the penalty" is a bit different from "provided the > basic idea of the ktime_t union and half the implementation"... so ... did you change your position from accusing us of not giving you _any_ credit: "It's also interesting how you do that without giving me any credit for it." to accusing us of not giving you _enough_ credit? Did i get that right? And ontop of that, you now want the credit for providing the basic idea for half of the ktimer/hrtimer implementation? Sorry that i did not find out in advance that you wanted _that_ ;-) Ingo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/