Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751573AbVLGSAc (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Dec 2005 13:00:32 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751634AbVLGSAc (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Dec 2005 13:00:32 -0500 Received: from e33.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.151]:43932 "EHLO e33.co.us.ibm.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751573AbVLGSAb (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Dec 2005 13:00:31 -0500 Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] x86_64: Fix collision between pmtimer and pit/hpet timekeeping From: john stultz To: Andi Kleen Cc: lkml , Chris McDermott , vojtech@suse.cz In-Reply-To: <20051207175338.GB11190@wotan.suse.de> References: <1133931639.10613.39.camel@cog.beaverton.ibm.com> <20051207175338.GB11190@wotan.suse.de> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2005 10:00:30 -0800 Message-Id: <1133978430.18188.3.camel@leatherman> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3 (2.2.3-2.fc4) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1736 Lines: 44 On Wed, 2005-12-07 at 18:53 +0100, Andi Kleen wrote: > On Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 09:00:39PM -0800, john stultz wrote: > > Hello, > > I thought I had caught all the problems when the no-legacy HPET support > > landed close to the time that the ACPI PM timer support landed, but > > apparently not. :( > > > > On systems that do not support the HPET legacy functions (basically the > > IBM x460, but there could be others), in time_init() we accidentally > > fall into a PM timer conditional and set the vxtime_hz value to the PM > > timer's frequency. We then use this value with the HPET for timekeeping. > > > > This patch (which mimics the behavior in time_init_gtod) corrects the > > collision. > > > > Andi, any objections or suggestions for a better way? > > Ok. I will apply it. > > But I never quite got why you fall back to the PIT on these systems > anyways - if LEGSUP is not set it just means that the HPET interrupt > cannot be routed to irq 0, right? It should be quite easy to change > the timer code to accept timer interrupts on other irqs. > > You just need to allocate the other interrupt and possibly coordinate > that with the hpet char driver (or rather move the code for that > from there to time.c). I think implementing that would be a better > solution. Indeed that does sound like a decent cleanup. I can't promise anything in the near future, but its on my list. Would you then want to move all systems to use the non-legacy HPET interrupt? thanks -john - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/