Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2005 19:18:58 +0100 (CET)
From: Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
       Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>, rostedt@goodmis.org, johnstul@us.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [patch 00/21] hrtimer - High-resolution timer subsystem
In-Reply-To: <20051207175708.GA3672@elte.hu>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0512071908420.1610@scrub.home>
References: <20051206000126.589223000@tglx.tec.linutronix.de>
 <Pine.LNX.4.61.0512061628050.1610@scrub.home> <1133908082.16302.93.camel@tglx.tec.linutronix.de>
 <Pine.LNX.4.61.0512070347450.1609@scrub.home> <20051207165550.GA2426@elte.hu>
 <Pine.LNX.4.61.0512071813540.1610@scrub.home> <20051207175708.GA3672@elte.hu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1051
Lines: 28

Hi,

On Wed, 7 Dec 2005, Ingo Molnar wrote:

> so ... did you change your position from accusing us of not giving you 
> _any_ credit:
> 
>    "It's also interesting how you do that without giving me
>     any credit for it."
> 
> to accusing us of not giving you _enough_ credit? Did i get that right?
> 
> And ontop of that, you now want the credit for providing the basic idea 
> for half of the ktimer/hrtimer implementation? Sorry that i did not find 
> out in advance that you wanted _that_ ;-)

Ingo, please stay serious and don't take things out of context.
I was just asking for some more/better credit for some of the ktime_t core 
ideas, I'll leave it now to you what you make with this and I won't 
further pursue this issue.
Can we please now get back to the more important issues?

bye, Roman
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/