Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751718AbVLGS36 (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Dec 2005 13:29:58 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751722AbVLGS36 (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Dec 2005 13:29:58 -0500 Received: from ns.suse.de ([195.135.220.2]:17105 "EHLO mx1.suse.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751715AbVLGS36 (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Dec 2005 13:29:58 -0500 Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2005 19:29:55 +0100 From: Andi Kleen To: john stultz Cc: Andi Kleen , lkml , Chris McDermott , vojtech@suse.cz Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] x86_64: Fix collision between pmtimer and pit/hpet timekeeping Message-ID: <20051207182955.GC11190@wotan.suse.de> References: <1133931639.10613.39.camel@cog.beaverton.ibm.com> <20051207175338.GB11190@wotan.suse.de> <1133978430.18188.3.camel@leatherman> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1133978430.18188.3.camel@leatherman> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 593 Lines: 16 On Wed, Dec 07, 2005 at 10:00:30AM -0800, john stultz wrote: > Would you then want to move all systems to use the non-legacy HPET > interrupt? You mean all HPET systems? Yes that might be a good idea unless someone else knows about problems with this. Interrupt 0 seems to be shakey on many systems so not using it is probably a good idea. -Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/