Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 8 Oct 2001 21:28:27 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 8 Oct 2001 21:28:17 -0400 Received: from cx739861-a.dt1.sdca.home.com ([24.5.164.61]:24325 "EHLO gnuppy.monkey.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 8 Oct 2001 21:28:08 -0400 Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2001 18:28:20 -0700 To: Rik van Riel Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, kernelnewbies@nl.linux.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [CFT][PATCH *] faster cache reclaim Message-ID: <20011008182820.A6361@gnuppy> In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.22i From: Bill Huey Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Oct 08, 2001 at 08:38:27PM -0300, Rik van Riel wrote: > It also reduces the distance between inactive_shortage and > inactive_plenty, so kswapd should spend much less time rolling > over pages from zones we're not interested in. > > This patch is meant to fix the problems where heavy cache > activity flushes out pages from the working set, while still > allowing the cache to put some pressure on the working set. Rik, It work well when I pressure it under some intensive IO operations under dpkg and made progress when previous VMs basically froze. I did have two running programs that have large working sets which created a lot of contention and some CPU choppiness, but possibly some per process thrash control should allow for both to make progress. ;-) Good work. bill - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/