DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
        b=TaM20T3hFWlrfz7rrJOIc/f+n3rIm6NGNKJ6L+AVyociP1dqrecDsY3aKfmPPRj+PwH3jvzTxOof4KbSzA2WxC3k0PKvsQfkJwNRhJNrCMJ5Th92eAmf9GDl76KCWwWGFGpqaHl+kVN3U4uQgV/Uvg65b6TpwZ6qi5gDVcBg5ns=
Message-ID: <aec7e5c30512071928s68b9df50hc2eaebd0964b175e@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2005 12:28:52 +0900
From: Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@gmail.com>
To: Jeffrey Hundstad <jeffrey.hundstad@mnsu.edu>
Subject: Re: Runs with Linux (tm)
Cc: Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@kvack.org>, Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com>,
       Dirk Steuwer <dirk@steuwer.de>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
In-Reply-To: <439760FF.3060605@mnsu.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <1133779953.9356.9.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org>
	 <20051206011844.GO28539@opteron.random>
	 <43944F42.2070207@didntduck.org>
	 <loom.20051206T094816-40@post.gmane.org>
	 <20051206104652.GB3354@favonius>
	 <loom.20051206T173458-358@post.gmane.org>
	 <20051207141720.GA533@kvack.org> <1133982741.17901.32.camel@mindpipe>
	 <20051207194746.GG533@kvack.org> <439760FF.3060605@mnsu.edu>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1762
Lines: 42

On 12/8/05, Jeffrey Hundstad <jeffrey.hundstad@mnsu.edu> wrote:
> Benjamin LaHaise wrote:
>
> >On Wed, Dec 07, 2005 at 02:12:20PM -0500, Lee Revell wrote:
> >
> >
> >>If even some "Linux-friendly" hardware manufacturers barely cooperate
> >>with the Linux comminuty now what makes you think this would work?
> >>
> >>
> >
> >Nothing in life is guaranteed.  But at the very least, I think it would
> >be a good step towards improving the Linux end user experience.  Instead
> >of the unclear mess we have now (Is it supported?  Check with your
> >vendor!), we would be able to say "Look for the Linux Certified logo".
> >Combine that with a standard format for source code driver disks, and
> >it would be a good step in the right direction.
> >
> >
> >
> The problem as I see it:
>
> A hardware vendor hires someone to write a driver.  The driver is
> completed and submitted and finally makes it into the kernel.  It's
> fully GPL and everyone is happy.  The hardware gets a "Native Linux
> Support" logo.  The card goes out of favor and no one is interested in
> maintaining the driver, it is marked obsolete and finally removed from
> the kernel. ...the logo still suggests the hardware will work.

I think "Designed for Windows" has the same problem. I know some
hardware that works well with Win98 but no driver exist for XP.
Fortunately that hardware works with Linux...

I would say the fix is "Runs with Linux(tm) 2005-2006" and the
hardware vendor finances maintainance during the specified period.

/ magnus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/