Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        stable@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Lambertz <mail@thomaslambertz.de>,
        anthony <antdev66@gmail.com>,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
        =?UTF-8?q?Radim=20Kr=C4=8Dm=C3=A1=C5=99?= <rkrcmar@redhat.com>,
        Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>
Subject: [PATCH 5.2 174/215] KVM: X86: Fix fpu state crash in kvm guest
Date:   Mon, 29 Jul 2019 21:22:50 +0200
Message-Id: <20190729190810.125640760@linuxfoundation.org>
In-Reply-To: <20190729190739.971253303@linuxfoundation.org>
References: <20190729190739.971253303@linuxfoundation.org>
User-Agent: quilt/0.66
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

From: Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>

commit e751732486eb3f159089a64d1901992b1357e7cc upstream.

The idea before commit 240c35a37 (which has just been reverted)
was that we have the following FPU states:

               userspace (QEMU)             guest
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
               processor                    vcpu->arch.guest_fpu
>>> KVM_RUN: kvm_load_guest_fpu
               vcpu->arch.user_fpu          processor
>>> preempt out
               vcpu->arch.user_fpu          current->thread.fpu
>>> preempt in
               vcpu->arch.user_fpu          processor
>>> back to userspace
>>> kvm_put_guest_fpu
               processor                    vcpu->arch.guest_fpu
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

With the new lazy model we want to get the state back to the processor
when schedule in from current->thread.fpu.

Reported-by: Thomas Lambertz <mail@thomaslambertz.de>
Reported-by: anthony <antdev66@gmail.com>
Tested-by: anthony <antdev66@gmail.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@redhat.com>
Cc: Thomas Lambertz <mail@thomaslambertz.de>
Cc: anthony <antdev66@gmail.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: 5f409e20b (x86/fpu: Defer FPU state load until return to userspace)
Signed-off-by: Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>
[Add a comment in front of the warning. - Paolo]
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

---
 arch/x86/kvm/x86.c |    9 ++++++---
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

--- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
@@ -3264,6 +3264,10 @@ void kvm_arch_vcpu_load(struct kvm_vcpu
 
 	kvm_x86_ops->vcpu_load(vcpu, cpu);
 
+	fpregs_assert_state_consistent();
+	if (test_thread_flag(TIF_NEED_FPU_LOAD))
+		switch_fpu_return();
+
 	/* Apply any externally detected TSC adjustments (due to suspend) */
 	if (unlikely(vcpu->arch.tsc_offset_adjustment)) {
 		adjust_tsc_offset_host(vcpu, vcpu->arch.tsc_offset_adjustment);
@@ -7955,9 +7959,8 @@ static int vcpu_enter_guest(struct kvm_v
 		wait_lapic_expire(vcpu);
 	guest_enter_irqoff();
 
-	fpregs_assert_state_consistent();
-	if (test_thread_flag(TIF_NEED_FPU_LOAD))
-		switch_fpu_return();
+	/* The preempt notifier should have taken care of the FPU already.  */
+	WARN_ON_ONCE(test_thread_flag(TIF_NEED_FPU_LOAD));
 
 	if (unlikely(vcpu->arch.switch_db_regs)) {
 		set_debugreg(0, 7);