Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 9 Oct 2001 01:56:00 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 9 Oct 2001 01:55:50 -0400 Received: from pizda.ninka.net ([216.101.162.242]:1675 "EHLO pizda.ninka.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 9 Oct 2001 01:55:42 -0400 Date: Mon, 08 Oct 2001 22:56:10 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <20011008.225610.94885115.davem@redhat.com> To: Paul.McKenney@us.ibm.com Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net, rth@redhat.com Subject: Re: RFC: patch to allow lock-free traversal of lists with insertion From: "David S. Miller" In-Reply-To: In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Mew version 2.0 on Emacs 21.0 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: "Paul McKenney" Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2001 22:27:44 -0700 All other CPUs must observe the preceding stores before the following stores. ... Does this do the trick? membar #StoreStore Yes. The IPIs and related junk are I believe needed only on Alpha, which has no single memory-barrier instruction that can do wmbdd()'s job. Given that Alpha seems to be on its way out, this did not seem to me to be too horrible. I somehow doubt that you need an IPI to implement the equivalent of "membar #StoreStore" on Alpha. Richard? Franks a lot, David S. Miller davem@redhat.com - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/