Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] sched/core: Don't use dying mm as active_mm of
 kthreads
To:     Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Cc:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-mm@kvack.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        Phil Auld <pauld@redhat.com>
References: <20190727171047.31610-1-longman@redhat.com>
 <20190729091249.GE9330@dhcp22.suse.cz>
 <556445a2-8912-c017-413c-7a4f36c4b89e@redhat.com>
 <20190729185853.GJ9330@dhcp22.suse.cz>
From:   Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Organization: Red Hat
Message-ID: <9e403b46-e0cb-0841-4ff7-6ecb30580d33@redhat.com>
Date:   Mon, 29 Jul 2019 16:41:00 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/60.7.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20190729185853.GJ9330@dhcp22.suse.cz>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On 7/29/19 2:58 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Mon 29-07-19 11:27:35, Waiman Long wrote:
>> On 7/29/19 5:12 AM, Michal Hocko wrote:
>>> On Sat 27-07-19 13:10:47, Waiman Long wrote:
>>>> It was found that a dying mm_struct where the owning task has exited
>>>> can stay on as active_mm of kernel threads as long as no other user
>>>> tasks run on those CPUs that use it as active_mm. This prolongs the
>>>> life time of dying mm holding up memory and other resources like swap
>>>> space that cannot be freed.
>>> IIRC use_mm doesn't pin the address space. It only pins the mm_struct
>>> itself. So what exactly is the problem here?
>> As explained in my response to Peter, I found that resource like swap
>> space were depleted even after the exit of the offending program in a
>> mostly idle system. This patch is to make sure that those resources get
>> freed after program exit ASAP.
> Could you elaborate more? How can a mm counter (do not confuse with
> mm_users) prevent address space to be torn down on exit?

Many of the resources tied to mm_struct are indeed freed when mm_users
becomes 0 including swap space reservation, I think. I was testing a mm
patch and it did have a missing mmput bug that cause mm_users not going
to 0. I fixed the bug, and with sched patch to speed up the release the
mm_struct, every was fine. I didn't realize that fixing the mm bug is
enough to free the swap space.

Still there are some resources not being free when the mm_count is
non-zero. It is certainly less serious than what I have thought. Sorry
for the confusion.

Cheers,
Longman