Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Tue, 30 Jul 2019 10:03:08 +0200
From:   Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To:     Mukesh Ojha <mojha@codeaurora.org>
Cc:     mingo@redhat.com, will@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] locking/mutex: Use mutex flags macro instead of hard
 code value
Message-ID: <20190730080308.GF31381@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
References: <1564397578-28423-1-git-send-email-mojha@codeaurora.org>
 <1564397578-28423-2-git-send-email-mojha@codeaurora.org>
 <20190729110727.GB31398@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
 <a80972a1-8e24-33cb-0088-49ef0e680540@codeaurora.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <a80972a1-8e24-33cb-0088-49ef0e680540@codeaurora.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 01:23:13PM +0530, Mukesh Ojha wrote:
> 
> On 7/29/2019 4:37 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 29, 2019 at 04:22:58PM +0530, Mukesh Ojha wrote:
> > > Let's use the mutex flag macro(which got moved from mutex.c
> > > to linux/mutex.h in the last patch) instead of hard code
> > > value which was used in __mutex_owner().
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Mukesh Ojha <mojha@codeaurora.org>
> > > ---
> > >   include/linux/mutex.h | 2 +-
> > >   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/include/linux/mutex.h b/include/linux/mutex.h
> > > index 79b28be..c3833ba 100644
> > > --- a/include/linux/mutex.h
> > > +++ b/include/linux/mutex.h
> > > @@ -87,7 +87,7 @@ struct mutex {
> > >    */
> > >   static inline struct task_struct *__mutex_owner(struct mutex *lock)
> > >   {
> > > -	return (struct task_struct *)(atomic_long_read(&lock->owner) & ~0x07);
> > > +	return (struct task_struct *)(atomic_long_read(&lock->owner) & ~MUTEX_FLAGS);
> > >   }
> > I would _much_ rather move __mutex_owner() out of line, you're exposing
> > far too much stuff.
> 
> if i understand you correctly, you want me to move __mutex_owner() to
> mutex.c
> __mutex_owner() is used in mutex_is_locked() and mutex_trylock_recursive
> inside linux/mutex.h.
> 
> Shall i move them as well ?

Yes, then you can make __mutex_owner() static.

Thanks!