Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932341AbVLHU0L (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Dec 2005 15:26:11 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932344AbVLHU0L (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Dec 2005 15:26:11 -0500 Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:11222 "EHLO mx2.suse.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932341AbVLHU0K (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Dec 2005 15:26:10 -0500 Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2005 21:26:08 +0100 From: Andi Kleen To: Ravikiran G Thirumalai Cc: Andi Kleen , Christoph Lameter , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, discuss@x86-64.org Subject: Re: [discuss] Re: pcibus_to_node value when no pxm info is present for the pci bus Message-ID: <20051208202608.GP11190@wotan.suse.de> References: <20051207223414.GA4493@localhost.localdomain> <20051208193439.GB3776@localhost.localdomain> <20051208200440.GB15804@wotan.suse.de> <20051208202138.GD3776@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20051208202138.GD3776@localhost.localdomain> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 545 Lines: 13 > That was my thinking earlier too, but shouldn't we have uniformity in > behaviour between kmalloc_node and alloc_pages_node wrt nodeid handling? > IMHO it would be less confusing that way. alloc_pages_node is not that much > of a fastpath routine anyways... No strong opinion either way. -Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/