Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932304AbVLHUgW (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Dec 2005 15:36:22 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932308AbVLHUgW (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Dec 2005 15:36:22 -0500 Received: from zrtps0kn.nortelnetworks.com ([47.140.192.55]:37787 "EHLO zrtps0kn.nortelnetworks.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932304AbVLHUgV (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Dec 2005 15:36:21 -0500 Message-ID: <4398993E.9010200@nortel.com> Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2005 14:36:14 -0600 From: "Christopher Friesen" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040115 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: lkml Subject: problem with gate_vma flags? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 08 Dec 2005 20:36:16.0165 (UTC) FILETIME=[096FCD50:01C5FC37] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 617 Lines: 19 When viewing /proc//maps on i386, the final page shows up as : ffffe000-fffff000 ---p 00000000 00:00 0 If I'm reading the code correctly, this is the address range controlled by gate_vma. The permissions are marked as nothing because when this vma is created "vm_flags" is set to 0. However, shouldn't it be at least VM_READ and possibly also VM_EXEC? Chris - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/