Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932328AbVLHUle (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Dec 2005 15:41:34 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932373AbVLHUle (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Dec 2005 15:41:34 -0500 Received: from omx2-ext.sgi.com ([192.48.171.19]:38332 "EHLO omx2.sgi.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932328AbVLHUld (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Dec 2005 15:41:33 -0500 Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2005 12:41:28 -0800 (PST) From: Christoph Lameter To: Ravikiran G Thirumalai cc: Andi Kleen , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, discuss@x86-64.org Subject: Re: [discuss] Re: pcibus_to_node value when no pxm info is present for the pci bus In-Reply-To: <20051208202138.GD3776@localhost.localdomain> Message-ID: References: <20051207223414.GA4493@localhost.localdomain> <20051208193439.GB3776@localhost.localdomain> <20051208200440.GB15804@wotan.suse.de> <20051208202138.GD3776@localhost.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 569 Lines: 14 On Thu, 8 Dec 2005, Ravikiran G Thirumalai wrote: > That was my thinking earlier too, but shouldn't we have uniformity in > behaviour between kmalloc_node and alloc_pages_node wrt nodeid handling? > IMHO it would be less confusing that way. alloc_pages_node is not that much > of a fastpath routine anyways... I agree. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/