Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932366AbVLHUrb (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Dec 2005 15:47:31 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932322AbVLHUra (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Dec 2005 15:47:30 -0500 Received: from cantor.suse.de ([195.135.220.2]:20649 "EHLO mx1.suse.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932372AbVLHUra (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Dec 2005 15:47:30 -0500 Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2005 21:47:28 +0100 From: Andi Kleen To: Christoph Lameter Cc: Ravikiran G Thirumalai , Andi Kleen , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, discuss@x86-64.org Subject: Re: [discuss] Re: pcibus_to_node value when no pxm info is present for the pci bus Message-ID: <20051208204728.GQ11190@wotan.suse.de> References: <20051207223414.GA4493@localhost.localdomain> <20051208193439.GB3776@localhost.localdomain> <20051208200440.GB15804@wotan.suse.de> <20051208202138.GD3776@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 686 Lines: 19 On Thu, Dec 08, 2005 at 12:41:28PM -0800, Christoph Lameter wrote: > On Thu, 8 Dec 2005, Ravikiran G Thirumalai wrote: > > > That was my thinking earlier too, but shouldn't we have uniformity in > > behaviour between kmalloc_node and alloc_pages_node wrt nodeid handling? > > IMHO it would be less confusing that way. alloc_pages_node is not that much > > of a fastpath routine anyways... > > I agree. Ok I will submit a patch. -Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/