Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 06/16] RISC-V: KVM: Implement
 KVM_GET_ONE_REG/KVM_SET_ONE_REG ioctls
To:     Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>
Cc:     Anup Patel <Anup.Patel@wdc.com>,
        Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@sifive.com>,
        Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
        Radim K <rkrcmar@redhat.com>,
        Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Atish Patra <Atish.Patra@wdc.com>,
        Alistair Francis <Alistair.Francis@wdc.com>,
        Damien Le Moal <Damien.LeMoal@wdc.com>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
        "kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
        "linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org" <linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
References: <20190729115544.17895-1-anup.patel@wdc.com>
 <20190729115544.17895-7-anup.patel@wdc.com>
 <3caa5b31-f5ed-98cd-2bdf-88d8cb837919@redhat.com>
 <536673cd-3b84-4e56-6042-de73a536653f@redhat.com>
 <CAAhSdy2jo6N4c9-_-hj=81mXjHjP8mvZy_8jOdRZELCyU9Y8Aw@mail.gmail.com>
From:   Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Openpgp: preference=signencrypt
Message-ID: <9f84c328-c5ad-b3cc-df0f-05f113476341@redhat.com>
Date:   Tue, 30 Jul 2019 14:10:54 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/60.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAAhSdy2jo6N4c9-_-hj=81mXjHjP8mvZy_8jOdRZELCyU9Y8Aw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On 30/07/19 14:08, Anup Patel wrote:
>> Still, I would prefer all the VS CSRs to be accessible via the get/set
>> reg ioctls.
> We had implemented VS CSRs access to user-space but then we
> removed it to keep this series simple and easy to review. We thought
> of adding it later when we deal with Guest/VM migration.
> 
> Do you want it to be added as part of this series ?

Yes, please.  It's not enough code to deserve a separate patch, and it
is useful for debugging.

Paolo