Received: by 2002:a25:ad19:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id y25csp4628852ybi; Tue, 30 Jul 2019 05:28:47 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzhaQclMFEBohs6f1RS4B+ypmlRsMgEnC9McxGomm+76Iooc6UCpZ6L2GXIQ38QCzi1Rp0y X-Received: by 2002:aa7:9118:: with SMTP id 24mr40102969pfh.56.1564489726994; Tue, 30 Jul 2019 05:28:46 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1564489726; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=P5lHaDTnadS7V4dJ66F+jrmYCxU/i0fo3pSE3BoPybXnFGZUguWn+K6PSR3pFK1E1l o8IhJ3e/TahwXpoDvcWakbofMOneqDRDHlt8OcF9vFmkDZ9Ma+vG9KD2qswZoL4Ml79L P1ngqJ9TlBdzBJR2kNooNnSccJjPQl0lJOUpnyGUVkcf0ZvJy335HGL6XVDP/5PoT3M/ cu3bAf/YChk7EIK0N6e6mLT84xwAgPN5DlaadyIRC7iBWhJVIGGJKOhSnVzfVQVn3BsS G1X1abvtr8AJnJRliGZ60LRPFavlauapjD6T62AqxdeBQyKsP7oJCTD4cWUeBoqPUGea p7sQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version; bh=Vg24wzBIc+D+Hmv+R1GPqhgrmLOPVkmrpAuvjDtlIDU=; b=Z/D/nBoZp8n669MlRoumwppwWsQ7NuViohL93N0uXoz9jAsGEncjOxXWkYJgJFETz7 EjUD981FHjgqvrZxy0WqavMjIEfVaMlJPT5sZiTfD8yuqyaUk7VBwpNjegQ0JCVPi5/y b84Ak0gXUBKCQhc76rcbMy1IC7niV8ak56f84jZnzIcSHOEWazMkLTq0k0lpDPMS0IRO yFlf9IIiYlqy3hbV01PLjvpc7SRWODIEfkgm+DRctK7F8A4VWptX8HeVU2iOmLtLFJtl 6KukbAKXanJ9AU/jncRLMrTU3H+2oHqRzPGapEJ/vPqDIEPhT547OgSh+TEePFVxKh5+ IA9A== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id j17si29604188pfa.198.2019.07.30.05.28.32; Tue, 30 Jul 2019 05:28:46 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730126AbfG3MZD (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 30 Jul 2019 08:25:03 -0400 Received: from mail-qt1-f195.google.com ([209.85.160.195]:33510 "EHLO mail-qt1-f195.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729973AbfG3MZB (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Jul 2019 08:25:01 -0400 Received: by mail-qt1-f195.google.com with SMTP id r6so58534480qtt.0 for ; Tue, 30 Jul 2019 05:25:00 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Vg24wzBIc+D+Hmv+R1GPqhgrmLOPVkmrpAuvjDtlIDU=; b=HTYpVHgcKfw3qjT7bgNIzF/J064+hCL62azBCtPvqrMGTRWJRTfa6OmXjl5UGTjfUB TAYx0n8THuIxaZ2BHWbEem7UeZRBj7KdlVi5MX5ukq0sXke3CfqEKyKL7LeRA3aj7clv kzSjyme9g1lpQfunxAWBWySJihV45rpoRFczqTwhzUKluKi3Y1YE6MUDUnxc1fHepAuw ycH4PXHjWBkG1fu5qYxoEgtcq+YC0PYytoJsB1YFkCq4hiG3mOuYa2FSrk8mJgm2oWYt VmLYEc59uDmG57w43gtvWdWmQFUt+HVPPAzV0+Tc94eZExyo4bWpje0VAxfmmj8Is1Gy lM6w== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVbxBNyGD9pfU9i8c6L6kjo4yuTSUEJq+U9KuzJpPF3UljuaLYa UIndKqTnVJVOTzDeAiJ+9pHxPOCou8LRJlo9RyM= X-Received: by 2002:a0c:ba2c:: with SMTP id w44mr81948752qvf.62.1564489499864; Tue, 30 Jul 2019 05:24:59 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Arnd Bergmann Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2019 14:24:43 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: RFC: remove Nuvoton w90x900/nuc900 platform? To: Wan ZongShun Cc: Linux ARM , Linus Walleij , Russell King , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Avi Fishman , Tomer Maimon , Tali Perry , Patrick Venture , Nancy Yuen , Benjamin Fair , OpenBMC Maillist Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 2:09 PM Mail Delivery Subsystem wrote: > On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 2:09 PM Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > > > As the mach-netx and mach-8695 platforms are being removed now, > > I wonder whether we should do the same with w90x00: Here is what > > I found after looking at the git history and external material for it. > > > > - The supported chips (nuc910/950/960) are no longer marketed > > by the manufacturer > > > > - Newer chips from the same family (nuc97x, nuc980, n329x) > > that are still marketed have Linux BSPs but those were never > > submitted for upstream inclusion. > > > > - Wan ZongShun is listed as maintainer, but the last patch he wrote > > was in 2011. > > > > - All patches to w90x900 platform specific files afterwards > > are cleanups that were apparently done without access to > > test hardware. > > > > - The http://www.mcuos.com/ website listed in the MAINTAINERS > > file is no longer reachable. > > Recipient inbox full > > Your message couldn't be delivered to mcuos.com@gmail.com. Their inbox is full, or it's getting too much mail right now. Yes, that too. Arnd