Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932326AbVLHVJF (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Dec 2005 16:09:05 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932363AbVLHVJF (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Dec 2005 16:09:05 -0500 Received: from omx3-ext.sgi.com ([192.48.171.20]:45221 "EHLO omx3.sgi.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932326AbVLHVJC (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Dec 2005 16:09:02 -0500 Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2005 13:08:33 -0800 (PST) From: Christoph Lameter To: Andi Kleen cc: akpm@osdl.org, Christoph Hellwig , linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, steiner@sgi.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Wu Fengguang Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] Zone reclaim V3: Frequency of failed reclaim attempts In-Reply-To: <20051208205241.GR11190@wotan.suse.de> Message-ID: References: <20051208203707.30456.57439.sendpatchset@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com> <20051208203717.30456.17434.sendpatchset@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com> <20051208205241.GR11190@wotan.suse.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 809 Lines: 20 On Thu, 8 Dec 2005, Andi Kleen wrote: > For long you don't need get_jiffies_64. On 32bit it would be 32bit > anyways and on 64bit even normal jiffies is 64bit. So normal > jiffies would be suffice. Patch follows. > But I suspect it would be better to just merge the proper patch > with the full accounting instead of this kludge. I would also like to see the full accounting patch to fix this in the right way but on the other hand I would like to disentangle different patchsets as much as possible. The accounting patch may touch many critical code paths. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/