Received: by 2002:a25:ad19:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id y25csp4958879ybi; Tue, 30 Jul 2019 11:09:41 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwVwv9QAd1bGfedxICpRgyThoLv3Ln59Gta0MkXT1+kb1rxyNbhFJA5my4nudXG3cBjmMr6 X-Received: by 2002:a65:5348:: with SMTP id w8mr109110550pgr.176.1564510181754; Tue, 30 Jul 2019 11:09:41 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1564510181; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=pSnKPmhMud0RIL6nDgQBnLH+TGS+FPRociWo7vdnmLk0XescmbEd51Du8Hg4eUNARU 5f1FBDJnOVcmifm4BEu3YG/B2G0uRaytAozXVHXhfp54vrmnhhL2qSelnZIDDS4MBHTK mgbO+9XvxE94Z9jpk2cqv2Z2sz+oJEhpyeurWoJhQTBLYTmleyJOd44av6/oP/SDM/yG ZKe6LssdPmn9g5+vS+SQdvGLLLRIcxE02i+lQ/HXlvAe3OOOMfs+HI6cC+hIqKajjKwF sgKxY9P8a8QEz+Y0av1HVfH6rPsor4osXF9J7o+hnk71lw/OkappUUHd1lbxD/qghA05 drwg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date; bh=PrvKKWGAGw91M3/+ujJPFfON9/lJZ6mRvC+QTBvVd4U=; b=iE9EV26/pdsFjahQsVoCLiTQDR8GeID2i8Xx/bJd9qwITFVpWh7KNzbMQbySWa8s+6 CZAVu9mil+myvbrFmYjrWBf9PClFnTcEdudDwIqFN8FaNlZ7JaynPInRUi4Z6xUcy01d nmRNe7dvPDolMUnmXqyM0hm9kh/4pp6w25MbvzE/P2idoM8oxg/g33L0EQdHB8+XEwQP omIIRtW1nrLsu8V8ex3MRK0t5ywfsqrCe3U0d4d+ETVsk2sI2PR2IRuU4/co/5hYNo1I tjyCygJnAvgPhtsdb+AhnlS9Xmm87N2invOPib7hIAokSH+DJWkla1D+kCmVbXJ++/Sf Jz5g== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id v8si27858779plo.384.2019.07.30.11.09.26; Tue, 30 Jul 2019 11:09:41 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729069AbfG3RHw (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 30 Jul 2019 13:07:52 -0400 Received: from gate.crashing.org ([63.228.1.57]:41566 "EHLO gate.crashing.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728647AbfG3RHv (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Jul 2019 13:07:51 -0400 Received: from gate.crashing.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by gate.crashing.org (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id x6UH7TlS016550; Tue, 30 Jul 2019 12:07:29 -0500 Received: (from segher@localhost) by gate.crashing.org (8.14.1/8.14.1/Submit) id x6UH7SxN016549; Tue, 30 Jul 2019 12:07:28 -0500 X-Authentication-Warning: gate.crashing.org: segher set sender to segher@kernel.crashing.org using -f Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2019 12:07:28 -0500 From: Segher Boessenkool To: Arnd Bergmann Cc: kbuild test robot , Nick Desaulniers , Linux Kernel Mailing List , clang-built-linux , Paul Mackerras , Nathan Chancellor , linuxppc-dev Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc: workaround clang codegen bug in dcbz Message-ID: <20190730170728.GQ31406@gate.crashing.org> References: <20190729202542.205309-1-ndesaulniers@google.com> <20190729203246.GA117371@archlinux-threadripper> <20190729215200.GN31406@gate.crashing.org> <20190730134856.GO31406@gate.crashing.org> <20190730161637.GP31406@gate.crashing.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190730161637.GP31406@gate.crashing.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 11:16:37AM -0500, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > in_le32 and friends? Yeah, huh. If LLVM copies that to the stack as > well, its (not byte reversing) read will be atomic just fine, so things > will still work correctly. > > The things defined with DEF_MMIO_IN_D (instead of DEF_MMIO_IN_X) do not > look like they will work correctly if an update form address is chosen, > but that won't happen because the constraint is "m" instead of "m<>", > making the %Un pretty useless (it will always be the empty string). Btw, this is true since GCC 4.8; before 4.8, plain "m" *could* have an automodify (autoinc, autodec, etc.) side effect. What is the minimum GCC version required, these days? https://gcc.gnu.org/PR44492 https://gcc.gnu.org/r161328 Segher