Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] soc: qcom: mdt_loader: add offset to
 request_firmware_into_buf
To:     Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc:     Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>,
        Andy Gross <andy.gross@linaro.org>,
        David Brown <david.brown@linaro.org>,
        Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
        "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
        BCM Kernel Feedback <bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com>,
        Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
References: <20190523025113.4605-1-scott.branden@broadcom.com>
 <20190523025113.4605-4-scott.branden@broadcom.com>
 <20190523055212.GA22946@kroah.com>
 <c12872f5-4dc3-9bc4-f89b-27037dc0b6ff@broadcom.com>
 <20190523165605.GB21048@kroah.com> <20190527053607.GV31438@minitux>
From:   Scott Branden <scott.branden@broadcom.com>
Message-ID: <4aec9d4e-fd6c-afba-d051-6ab22bdfa17f@broadcom.com>
Date:   Tue, 30 Jul 2019 16:02:40 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/60.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20190527053607.GV31438@minitux>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Hi Bjorn,

On 2019-05-26 10:36 p.m., Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> On Thu 23 May 09:56 PDT 2019, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>
>> On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 09:41:49AM -0700, Scott Branden wrote:
>>> Hi Greg,
>>>
>>> On 2019-05-22 10:52 p.m., Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>>>> On Wed, May 22, 2019 at 07:51:13PM -0700, Scott Branden wrote:
>>>>> Adjust request_firmware_into_buf API to allow for portions
>>>>> of firmware file to be read into a buffer.  mdt_loader still
>>>>> retricts request fo whole file read into buffer.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Scott Branden <scott.branden@broadcom.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>>    drivers/soc/qcom/mdt_loader.c | 7 +++++--
>>>>>    1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/soc/qcom/mdt_loader.c b/drivers/soc/qcom/mdt_loader.c
>>>>> index 1c488024c698..ad20d159699c 100644
>>>>> --- a/drivers/soc/qcom/mdt_loader.c
>>>>> +++ b/drivers/soc/qcom/mdt_loader.c
>>>>> @@ -172,8 +172,11 @@ static int __qcom_mdt_load(struct device *dev, const struct firmware *fw,
>>>>>    		if (phdr->p_filesz) {
>>>>>    			sprintf(fw_name + fw_name_len - 3, "b%02d", i);
>>>>> -			ret = request_firmware_into_buf(&seg_fw, fw_name, dev,
>>>>> -							ptr, phdr->p_filesz);
>>>>> +			ret = request_firmware_into_buf
>>>>> +						(&seg_fw, fw_name, dev,
>>>>> +						 ptr, phdr->p_filesz,
>>>>> +						 0,
>>>>> +						 KERNEL_PREAD_FLAG_WHOLE);
>>>> So, all that work in the first 2 patches for no real change at all?  Why
>>>> are these changes even needed?
>>> The first two patches allow partial read of files into memory.
>>>
>>> Existing kernel drivers haven't need such functionality so, yes, there
>>> should be no real change
>>>
>>> with first two patches other than adding such partial file read support.
>>>
>>> We have a new driver in development which needs partial read of files
>>> supported in the kernel.
>> As I said before, I can not take new apis without any in-kernel user.
>> So let's wait for your new code that thinks it needs this, and then we
>> will be glad to evaluate all of this at that point in time.
>>
> The .mdt files are ELF files split to avoid having to allocate large
> (5-60MB) chunks of temporary firmware buffers while installing the
> segments.
>
> But for multiple reasons it would be nice to be able to load the
> non-split ELF files and the proposed interface would allow this.
>
> So I definitely like the gist of the series.
>
>> To do so otherwise is to have loads of unused "features" aquiring cruft
>> in the kernel source, and you do not want that.
>>
> Agreed.
>
> I'll take the opportunity and see if I can implement this (support for
> non-split Qualcomm firmware) based on the patches in this series.

I'm back from my leave now.

Have you managed to utilize my partial firmware read in your driver yet?

>
> Regards,
> Bjorn