Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
From:   Fuqian Huang <huangfq.daxian@gmail.com>
Cc:     Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>,
        Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@bootlin.com>,
        Sean Paul <sean@poorly.run>, David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
        dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Fuqian Huang <huangfq.daxian@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH] drm: use trace_printk rather than printk in drm_dbg.
Date:   Wed, 31 Jul 2019 10:45:33 +0800
Message-Id: <20190731024533.22264-1-huangfq.daxian@gmail.com>
To:     unlisted-recipients:; (no To-header on input)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

In drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ih.c,
amdgpu_ih_process calls DRM_DEBUG which calls drm_dbg and
finally calls printk.
As amdgpu_ih_process is called from an interrupt handler,
and interrupt handler should be short as possible.

As printk may lead to bogging down the system or can even
create a live lock. printk should not be used in IRQ context.
Instead, trace_printk is recommended.
Link: https://lwn.net/Articles/365835

Signed-off-by: Fuqian Huang <huangfq.daxian@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/drm_print.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_print.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_print.c
index a17c8a14dba4..90cded140146 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_print.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_print.c
@@ -236,7 +236,7 @@ void drm_dbg(unsigned int category, const char *format, ...)
 	vaf.fmt = format;
 	vaf.va = &args;
 
-	printk(KERN_DEBUG "[" DRM_NAME ":%ps] %pV",
+	trace_printk(KERN_DEBUG "[" DRM_NAME ":%ps] %pV",
 	       __builtin_return_address(0), &vaf);
 
 	va_end(args);
-- 
2.11.0