Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Wed, 31 Jul 2019 11:27:03 +0200
From:   Sven Schnelle <svens@stackframe.org>
To:     Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>
Cc:     Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>, linux-mm@kvack.org,
        Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de>,
        Mark Rutland <Mark.Rutland@arm.com>, x86@kernel.org,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
        Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        =?iso-8859-1?B?Suly9G1l?= Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
        James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
        "Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 00/21] Generic page walk and ptdump
Message-ID: <20190731092703.GA31316@t470p.stackframe.org>
References: <20190722154210.42799-1-steven.price@arm.com>
 <794fb469-00c8-af10-92a8-cb7c0c83378b@arm.com>
 <270ce719-49f9-7c61-8b25-bc9548a2f478@arm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <270ce719-49f9-7c61-8b25-bc9548a2f478@arm.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Hi Steven,

On Mon, Jul 29, 2019 at 12:32:25PM +0100, Steven Price wrote:
> 
> parisc is more interesting and I'm not sure if this is necessarily
> correct. I originally proposed a patch with the line "For parisc, we
> don't support large pages, so add stubs returning 0" which got Acked by
> Helge Deller. However going back to look at that again I see there was a
> follow up thread[2] which possibly suggests I was wrong?

I just started a week ago implementing ptdump for PA-RISC. Didn't notice that
you're working on making it generic, which is nice. I'll adjust my code
to use the infrastructure you're currently developing.

> Can anyone shed some light on whether parisc does support leaf entries
> of the page table tree at a higher than the normal depth?
> 
> [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/2/27/572
> [2] https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/3/5/610

My understanding is that PA-RISC only has leaf entries on PTE level.

> The intention is that the page table walker would be available for all
> architectures so that it can be used in any generic code - PTDUMP simply
> seemed like a good place to start.
> 
> > Now that pmd_leaf() and pud_leaf() are getting used in walk_page_range() these
> > functions need to be defined on all arch irrespective if they use PTDUMP or not
> > or otherwise just define it for archs which need them now for sure i.e x86 and
> > arm64 (which are moving to new generic PTDUMP framework). Other archs can
> > implement these later.

I'll take care of the PA-RISC part - for 32 bit your generic code works, for 64Bit
i need to learn a bit more about the following hack:

arch/parisc/include/asm/pgalloc.h:15
/* Allocate the top level pgd (page directory)
 *
 * Here (for 64 bit kernels) we implement a Hybrid L2/L3 scheme: we
 * allocate the first pmd adjacent to the pgd.  This means that we can
 * subtract a constant offset to get to it.  The pmd and pgd sizes are
 * arranged so that a single pmd covers 4GB (giving a full 64-bit
 * process access to 8TB) so our lookups are effectively L2 for the
 * first 4GB of the kernel (i.e. for all ILP32 processes and all the
 * kernel for machines with under 4GB of memory)
 */

I see that your change clear P?D entries when p?d_bad() returns true, which - i think -
would be the case with the PA-RISC implementation.

Regards
Sven