Received: by 2002:a25:ad19:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id y25csp5860711ybi; Wed, 31 Jul 2019 04:32:15 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwecT1+1Mnjzhs9Ju4UZ+y/VLBgyfbfNBnrve/5PEIgnCYwZtblBgraFZYIxcwZrKFczB8a X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:2190:: with SMTP id q16mr2448834pjc.23.1564572735440; Wed, 31 Jul 2019 04:32:15 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1564572735; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=OMq5zqRR3ZUCc0UzIJMbBF1agq+HedSwxUciatM4HIVW9mywPJBZZmDV7DcULhtYCa wRngQGxMUTMddEQEQEmYKaHHoLYQB80UQcZtKsyWyRSUhs4nhhHBlErTr3gHdFHIr47g rbSMqOJlnKvlm1aWsn+ntkQMh3USpystH/7pCx+hXlBAz/BC5zMHN27xyaFp66RUadZH tyK4uNn5ScSaeLHFD+3A3jIMcTkZgDHNKBEVIt8dx4hPO56q8ipxMc+Pb2DnbpuG7wQ4 4lOD8QRaOFVHJYTPG5IPHdNdiCOUNhfs1poph8TvIKEbcqA20Q/vBB9DGrxVHsr7bnP2 nU7A== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:message-id:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=2+CRfz1X1OiIYvXZB1DJAWYXp0o6CL/Rn7doQU2wfbQ=; b=mH763fqAoOzZZr/5C+P7lFQfnJ5AG3u6qCy47j8eO0c/ieM71yaB226ufip5zacwOk S4XpaHhqeOdGKE6YAgvhFGDwbbf32a6Pnkpp74Vnyfm60vOTPKb//02gECdATEADfFLv L7F7VmCqAMq6XW2h48w9FEAQHlPTq4pZtx/SePJ/pjTyj4LOnQH4RO8LS1vKvpuSDlq1 RWaFYw9QGlTVPOOwe6wvFBt+B+G3SmryKxPXfxjrv9ZUlHeOhahjShDdgb5ysGs7Gl/8 oBsHoJQV2kUJ4n0XDkxB7EkiIBHehSMAIIj8jcnlvI+ID7+CIUlolVqnYSWD2zEbP48+ JoEQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id i6si32302884pfb.122.2019.07.31.04.31.59; Wed, 31 Jul 2019 04:32:15 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728668AbfGaLPb (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 31 Jul 2019 07:15:31 -0400 Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.158.5]:64010 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726607AbfGaLPa (ORCPT ); Wed, 31 Jul 2019 07:15:30 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098420.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x6VBCtbp191772 for ; Wed, 31 Jul 2019 07:15:29 -0400 Received: from e06smtp03.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp03.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.99]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2u39q98tj3-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Wed, 31 Jul 2019 07:15:28 -0400 Received: from localhost by e06smtp03.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Wed, 31 Jul 2019 12:15:26 +0100 Received: from b06avi18626390.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (9.149.26.192) by e06smtp03.uk.ibm.com (192.168.101.133) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256) Wed, 31 Jul 2019 12:15:23 +0100 Received: from d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.61]) by b06avi18626390.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id x6VBF56l33554876 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 31 Jul 2019 11:15:05 GMT Received: from d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7BCB11C05E; Wed, 31 Jul 2019 11:15:21 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DFEB11C050; Wed, 31 Jul 2019 11:15:21 +0000 (GMT) Received: from osiris (unknown [9.152.212.134]) by d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Wed, 31 Jul 2019 11:15:21 +0000 (GMT) Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2019 13:15:20 +0200 From: Heiko Carstens To: Herbert Xu Cc: Stephen Rothwell , Ard Biesheuvel , Linux Next Mailing List , Linux Kernel Mailing List , linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, Harald Freudenberger , Patrick Steuer Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Jul 31 - s390 crypto build breakage References: <20190731163915.3fdfcb14@canb.auug.org.au> <20190731085819.GA3488@osiris> <20190731110816.GA20753@gondor.apana.org.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190731110816.GA20753@gondor.apana.org.au> X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 19073111-0012-0000-0000-00000337F6EE X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 19073111-0013-0000-0000-000021719FB9 Message-Id: <20190731111520.GC3488@osiris> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:,, definitions=2019-07-31_04:,, signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=1 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1906280000 definitions=main-1907310117 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 09:08:17PM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote: > On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 10:58:20AM +0200, Heiko Carstens wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 04:39:15PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > > > Changes since 20190730: > > > > Hello Ard, > > > > two of your patches in the crypto tree cause build breakage on s390: > > > > The patch ("crypto: aes - create AES library based on the fixed time AES code") > > causes this: > > Ard already sent a patch for this which I've just pushed out. Ok, thanks! However that doesn't fix the simd.h header file breakage with the second patch :)