Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S964787AbVLIQip (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Dec 2005 11:38:45 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932464AbVLIQio (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Dec 2005 11:38:44 -0500 Received: from prgy-npn2.prodigy.com ([207.115.54.38]:54806 "EHLO oddball.prodigy.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932461AbVLIQio (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Dec 2005 11:38:44 -0500 Message-ID: <4395EB14.60802@tmr.com> Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2005 14:48:36 -0500 From: Bill Davidsen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.11) Gecko/20050729 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jeff Garzik CC: Ben Collins , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: RFC: Starting a stable kernel series off the 2.6 kernel References: <20051203135608.GJ31395@stusta.de> <1133620264.2171.14.camel@localhost.localdomain> <4394C745.2020802@tmr.com> <4394EDDE.30605@pobox.com> In-Reply-To: <4394EDDE.30605@pobox.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1534 Lines: 34 Jeff Garzik wrote: > Bill Davidsen wrote: > >> I do think the old model was better; by holding down major changes for >> six months or so after a new even release came out, people had a >> chance to polich the stable release, and developers had time to >> recharge their batteries so to speak, and to sit and think about what >> they wanted to do, without feeling the pressure to write code and >> submit it right away. Knowing that there's no place to send code for >> six months is a great aid to generating GOOD code. > > > It never worked that way, which is why the model changed. > > Like it or not, developers would only focus on one release. In the old > model, unstable things would get shoved into the stable kernel, because > people didn't want to wait six months. And for the unstable kernel, it > would often be so horribly broken that even developers couldn't use it > for development (think 2.5.x IDE). I was actually thinking of Rusty's module code... I do every time I have to build an initrd file by hand "Although the syntax is similar to the older /etc/modules.conf, there are many features missing." -- -bill davidsen (davidsen@tmr.com) "The secret to procrastination is to put things off until the last possible moment - but no longer" -me - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/