Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
From:   Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <krisman@collabora.com>
To:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc:     mingo@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org, dvhart@infradead.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel@collabora.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 1/2] futex: Split key setup from key queue locking and read
References: <20190730220602.28781-1-krisman@collabora.com>
        <alpine.DEB.2.21.1908010131200.1788@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
        <85sgql7nok.fsf@collabora.com>
Date:   Wed, 31 Jul 2019 20:22:30 -0400
In-Reply-To: <85sgql7nok.fsf@collabora.com> (Gabriel Krisman Bertazi's message
        of "Wed, 31 Jul 2019 20:07:55 -0400")
Message-ID: <85d0hp4tvd.fsf@collabora.com>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <krisman@collabora.com> writes:

> Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> writes:
>> What has this to do with futex_requeue()? Absolutely nothing unleass you
>> can reused that code there, which I doubt.
>
>I think it could be reused there

Though I admit to not having tried it out.  I suppose I can just drop
the reference from the commit message when I submit the new version.


-- 
Gabriel Krisman Bertazi