Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
User-Agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.1.6-799-g925e343-fmstable-20190729v1
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <3691f6cb-2451-43f7-9f00-d5693071ba59@www.fastmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <9d0f2b20-e6f6-419c-a866-c4a0dd92aa63@www.fastmail.com>
References: <20190724081313.12934-1-andrew@aj.id.au>
 <CACRpkdapypySGPrLgSMSNy1fzkca2BfMUGzf3koFWQZ-M5VOvg@mail.gmail.com>
 <9d0f2b20-e6f6-419c-a866-c4a0dd92aa63@www.fastmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 01 Aug 2019 15:15:42 +0930
From:   "Andrew Jeffery" <andrew@aj.id.au>
To:     "Linus Walleij" <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Cc:     linux-aspeed <linux-aspeed@lists.ozlabs.org>,
        "Lee Jones" <lee.jones@linaro.org>,
        "Rob Herring" <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        "Mark Rutland" <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
        "Joel Stanley" <joel@jms.id.au>,
        "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" 
        <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
        "Linux ARM" <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] ARM: dts: aspeed: Deprecate g[45]-style compatibles
Content-Type: text/plain
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk


On Tue, 30 Jul 2019, at 10:27, Andrew Jeffery wrote:
> 
> 
> On Tue, 30 Jul 2019, at 07:23, Linus Walleij wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 10:13 AM Andrew Jeffery <andrew@aj.id.au> wrote:
> > 
> > > It's probably best if we push the three patches all through one tree rather
> > > than fragmenting. Is everyone happy if Joel applies them to the aspeed tree?
> > 
> > If you are sure it will not collide with parallell work in the
> > pinctrl tree, yes.
> > Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
> > 
> > (If it does collide I'd prefer to take the pinctrl patches and fix the
> > conflicts in my tree.)
> 
> Fair enough, I don't know the answer so I'll poke around. I don't 
> really mind
> where the series goes in, I just want to avoid landing only part of it 
> if I split it up.

Okay, it currently conflicts with my cleanup-devicetree-warnings series.

Joel, do you mind if Linus takes this series through the pinctrl tree, given
the fix to the devicetrees is patch 1/3?

Andrew