Received: by 2002:a25:ad19:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id y25csp6979633ybi; Thu, 1 Aug 2019 01:20:33 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwbvLfKZYJzPRiBD9oZ8Y277m2pY/MGVN6pVqsK8nPzcuJwddHfaSrJHO/Mda4yjVw3+qAH X-Received: by 2002:a63:2b8e:: with SMTP id r136mr84083848pgr.216.1564647633419; Thu, 01 Aug 2019 01:20:33 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1564647633; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=qzUIksgYR6/+07rRTpkS67hOJ7w3quvYzlFSq8Ye1BogdnwKYr0sBab+/TXRlpcz2V pHzSeLMcgvS5VCBiLbg8rYLsKSMmXi9pm/N0HyWNSPx+2pH5JzcfuOY6Zw0gCJ4/Mm9E Vez0XAHbJ8lMEODWw2kAaPCn5G4KKNj4Qdfx+wkrdSzftAuCjD082FGDq+xc7TPG68Tg b3wGQzb73xYUCLS8QS9oQSCF315gcYG+uj6dtDVbxtdenRzh2Dl6WuQBr1dQwP2fT+p7 Y8x01OXwZoYxHHubzkrKQW2uTqnp1OiGYGUn9zY6xmzP06WYkTnSk2jW/14dSITkIiG3 tyjg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:from:references:cc:to:subject; bh=YOZJwYkDkrR6/Sa1Q8MRw/TF8f3zzB2eb1h5mEpc3Qg=; b=lH7Kk92fLMtBYkQwr7p/joVExTSx8Pv74HsgfiKxZqzH0ANu4+fhhKAHa5mw3kbYTS eKrmt0ESe03VJdvv/AzazG4PU2L5XxITZXba5N2bm1XUjlhje81e7xwomwYu0rVRu3DX uDWSmXANa1BbHkPrm2OQG7gjM96v7lsOF2r0PoWaqnHYfEjSMRSFhslSg0zvQnramCM3 zb/ndV6cE2dpAO1TD1N3zasEy4INrhWQISw3naEoUtedn82YR9zb7OvfxCynXk9PML2t 13uOrnuNojxEc1Uo8ul5aIl+DyMHAXAMWRMvI0rHXQRXT9+nbpoVOLHVjltwqhecAwje OlJw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id l6si9934296pgp.391.2019.08.01.01.20.17; Thu, 01 Aug 2019 01:20:33 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728677AbfHAHIt (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 1 Aug 2019 03:08:49 -0400 Received: from szxga06-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.32]:44466 "EHLO huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725790AbfHAHIt (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Aug 2019 03:08:49 -0400 Received: from DGGEMS407-HUB.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.58]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 986BA2AF03FEEE3059D2; Thu, 1 Aug 2019 15:08:44 +0800 (CST) Received: from [10.134.22.195] (10.134.22.195) by smtp.huawei.com (10.3.19.207) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.439.0; Thu, 1 Aug 2019 15:08:40 +0800 Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] f2fs: separate NOCoW and pinfile semantics To: Jaegeuk Kim CC: , , References: <20190719073903.9138-1-yuchao0@huawei.com> <20190723023640.GC60778@jaegeuk-macbookpro.roam.corp.google.com> <20190729055738.GA95664@jaegeuk-macbookpro.roam.corp.google.com> <07cd3aba-3516-9ba5-286e-277abb98e244@huawei.com> <20190730180231.GB76478@jaegeuk-macbookpro.roam.corp.google.com> <00e70eb1-c4fa-a6c9-69d7-71ff995c7d6c@huawei.com> <20190801041435.GB84433@jaegeuk-macbookpro.roam.corp.google.com> From: Chao Yu Message-ID: Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2019 15:08:39 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20190801041435.GB84433@jaegeuk-macbookpro.roam.corp.google.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.134.22.195] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2019/8/1 12:14, Jaegeuk Kim wrote: > On 07/31, Chao Yu wrote: >> On 2019/7/31 2:02, Jaegeuk Kim wrote: >>> On 07/29, Chao Yu wrote: >>>> On 2019/7/29 13:57, Jaegeuk Kim wrote: >>>>> On 07/23, Chao Yu wrote: >>>>>> On 2019/7/23 10:36, Jaegeuk Kim wrote: >>>>>>> On 07/19, Chao Yu wrote: >>>>>>>> Pinning a file is heavy, because skipping pinned files make GC >>>>>>>> running with heavy load or no effect. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Pinned file is a part of NOCOW files, so I don't think we can simply drop it >>>>>>> for backward compatibility. >>>>>> >>>>>> Yes, >>>>>> >>>>>> But what I concerned is that pin file is too heavy, so in order to satisfy below >>>>>> demand, how about introducing pin_file_2 flag to triggering IPU only during >>>>>> flush/writeback. >>>>> >>>>> That can be done by cold files? >>>> >>>> Then it may inherit property of cold type file, e.g. a) goes into cold area; b) >>>> update with very low frequency. >>>> >>>> Actually pin_file_2 could be used by db-wal/log file, which are updated >>>> frequently, and should go to hot/warm area, it does not match above two property. >>> >>> How about considering another name like "IPU-only mode"? >>> >>> fallocate write Flag GC >>> Pin_file: preallocate IPU FS_NOCOW_FL Not allowed >>> IPU_file: Not preallocate IPU N/A Default by temperature >> >> One question, do we need preallocate physical block address for IPU_file as >> Pin_file? since it can enhance db file's sequential read performance, not sure, >> db can handle random data in preallocated blocks. > > db file will do atomic writes, which can not be used with this. -wal may be able Now WAL mode were set by default in Android, so most of db file are -wal type now. > to preallocate blocks, but it can eat disk space unnecessarily. I meant .db-wal file rather than .db. Yes, that's ext4 style, that would bring better performance due to less holes in block distribution. I don't think we need to worry about space issue for db-wal file. I tracked .db-wal file's update before: - there are very frequently truncation and deletion, that means the preallocated blocks won't exist for long time. - and also there are very frequently append writes, I suspect there almost very few preallocate block are not written. - total db-wal file number is less. > >> >> Other behaviors looks good to me. :) >> >> I plan to use last bit in inode.i_inline to store this flag. > > Why not using i_flag like FS_NOCOW_FL? Oops, as you listed in last email, I can see you don't want to break FS_NOCOW_FL's semantics for backward compatibility. Flag IPU_file N/A If we plan to use FS_NOCOW_FL, that's what this patch has already did, you can merge it directly... :P > >> >>> Cold_file: Not preallocate IPU N/A Move in cold area >>> Hot_file: Not preallocate IPU/OPU N/A Move in hot area >> >> Should hot file be gced to hot area? That would mix new hot data with old 'hot' >> data which actually become cold. > > But, user explicitly specified this is hot. With current implementation, GC will migrate data from hot/warm/cold area to cold area. Thanks, > >> >> Thanks, >> >>> >>>> >>>> Thank, >>>> >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> So that this patch propose to separate nocow and pinfile semantics: >>>>>>>> - NOCoW flag can only be set on regular file. >>>>>>>> - NOCoW file will only trigger IPU at common writeback/flush. >>>>>>>> - NOCow file will do OPU during GC. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> For the demand of 1) avoid fragment of file's physical block and >>>>>>>> 2) userspace don't care about file's specific physical address, >>>>>>>> tagging file as NOCoW will be cheaper than pinned one. >>>>>> >>>>>> ^^^ >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Chao Yu >>>>>>>> --- >>>>>>>> v2: >>>>>>>> - rebase code to fix compile error. >>>>>>>> fs/f2fs/data.c | 3 ++- >>>>>>>> fs/f2fs/f2fs.h | 1 + >>>>>>>> fs/f2fs/file.c | 22 +++++++++++++++++++--- >>>>>>>> 3 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/data.c b/fs/f2fs/data.c >>>>>>>> index a2a28bb269bf..15fb8954c363 100644 >>>>>>>> --- a/fs/f2fs/data.c >>>>>>>> +++ b/fs/f2fs/data.c >>>>>>>> @@ -1884,7 +1884,8 @@ static inline bool check_inplace_update_policy(struct inode *inode, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> bool f2fs_should_update_inplace(struct inode *inode, struct f2fs_io_info *fio) >>>>>>>> { >>>>>>>> - if (f2fs_is_pinned_file(inode)) >>>>>>>> + if (f2fs_is_pinned_file(inode) || >>>>>>>> + F2FS_I(inode)->i_flags & F2FS_NOCOW_FL) >>>>>>>> return true; >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> /* if this is cold file, we should overwrite to avoid fragmentation */ >>>>>>>> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h >>>>>>>> index 596ab3e1dd7b..f6c5a3d2e659 100644 >>>>>>>> --- a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h >>>>>>>> +++ b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h >>>>>>>> @@ -2374,6 +2374,7 @@ static inline void f2fs_change_bit(unsigned int nr, char *addr) >>>>>>>> #define F2FS_NOATIME_FL 0x00000080 /* do not update atime */ >>>>>>>> #define F2FS_INDEX_FL 0x00001000 /* hash-indexed directory */ >>>>>>>> #define F2FS_DIRSYNC_FL 0x00010000 /* dirsync behaviour (directories only) */ >>>>>>>> +#define F2FS_NOCOW_FL 0x00800000 /* Do not cow file */ >>>>>>>> #define F2FS_PROJINHERIT_FL 0x20000000 /* Create with parents projid */ >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> /* Flags that should be inherited by new inodes from their parent. */ >>>>>>>> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/file.c b/fs/f2fs/file.c >>>>>>>> index 7ca545874060..ae0fec54cac6 100644 >>>>>>>> --- a/fs/f2fs/file.c >>>>>>>> +++ b/fs/f2fs/file.c >>>>>>>> @@ -1692,6 +1692,7 @@ static const struct { >>>>>>>> { F2FS_NOATIME_FL, FS_NOATIME_FL }, >>>>>>>> { F2FS_INDEX_FL, FS_INDEX_FL }, >>>>>>>> { F2FS_DIRSYNC_FL, FS_DIRSYNC_FL }, >>>>>>>> + { F2FS_NOCOW_FL, FS_NOCOW_FL }, >>>>>>>> { F2FS_PROJINHERIT_FL, FS_PROJINHERIT_FL }, >>>>>>>> }; >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> @@ -1715,7 +1716,8 @@ static const struct { >>>>>>>> FS_NODUMP_FL | \ >>>>>>>> FS_NOATIME_FL | \ >>>>>>>> FS_DIRSYNC_FL | \ >>>>>>>> - FS_PROJINHERIT_FL) >>>>>>>> + FS_PROJINHERIT_FL | \ >>>>>>>> + FS_NOCOW_FL) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> /* Convert f2fs on-disk i_flags to FS_IOC_{GET,SET}FLAGS flags */ >>>>>>>> static inline u32 f2fs_iflags_to_fsflags(u32 iflags) >>>>>>>> @@ -1753,8 +1755,6 @@ static int f2fs_ioc_getflags(struct file *filp, unsigned long arg) >>>>>>>> fsflags |= FS_ENCRYPT_FL; >>>>>>>> if (f2fs_has_inline_data(inode) || f2fs_has_inline_dentry(inode)) >>>>>>>> fsflags |= FS_INLINE_DATA_FL; >>>>>>>> - if (is_inode_flag_set(inode, FI_PIN_FILE)) >>>>>>>> - fsflags |= FS_NOCOW_FL; >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> fsflags &= F2FS_GETTABLE_FS_FL; >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> @@ -1794,6 +1794,22 @@ static int f2fs_ioc_setflags(struct file *filp, unsigned long arg) >>>>>>>> if (ret) >>>>>>>> goto out; >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> + if ((fsflags ^ old_fsflags) & FS_NOCOW_FL) { >>>>>>>> + if (!S_ISREG(inode->i_mode)) { >>>>>>>> + ret = -EINVAL; >>>>>>>> + goto out; >>>>>>>> + } >>>>>>>> + >>>>>>>> + if (f2fs_should_update_outplace(inode, NULL)) { >>>>>>>> + ret = -EINVAL; >>>>>>>> + goto out; >>>>>>>> + } >>>>>>>> + >>>>>>>> + ret = f2fs_convert_inline_inode(inode); >>>>>>>> + if (ret) >>>>>>>> + goto out; >>>>>>>> + } >>>>>>>> + >>>>>>>> ret = f2fs_setflags_common(inode, iflags, >>>>>>>> f2fs_fsflags_to_iflags(F2FS_SETTABLE_FS_FL)); >>>>>>>> out: >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> 2.18.0.rc1 >>>>>>> . >>>>>>> >>>>> . >>>>> >>> . >>> > . >