Received: by 2002:a25:ad19:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id y25csp7058729ybi; Thu, 1 Aug 2019 02:35:09 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzWWfIHwIl9HZnGrvj2T+gvf0LDSKHY3+Tix2TI1MF8pGTdyn4D980TqP1mNwlL8YT4V1jG X-Received: by 2002:a63:de4f:: with SMTP id y15mr122419499pgi.239.1564652108935; Thu, 01 Aug 2019 02:35:08 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1564652108; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=VinWzN3VjVZi80DtLEVitSYvWP7CHF8uTnsH/GQU00IvRYhCnvAC3kpQbcnPo5knyu BZd1YacW0kCfdOf0/6TXi7bd+cMXyPAfpLIo+VqQg4THjJNxRakX1LFXSCC7d4j8SF9d AGxuMaY6F28ffpgNR07ecCmFyr6u13vGZU+JeX8HCJrJEq6nLX2SjKLnfcP+YkAaEKXk 6CgMTIev16m0cK4S2kjxM9W9WTLLe6+y2eKlSy5hKdoa3Xq4zTbnQCUhnDcKQzix7LYK bj2y0XkH8iTMuY7e6uSOV0ok6lL9qo6ZOZfdgWzIrMC3boI2GdhudTwTZmZtr/1+HpWe xKTA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:mime-version:user-agent:references :message-id:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=knuWxdjEUspNoXQ5uqh0QPWCJOwwJ/paNIf9Am0PWJA=; b=njc5l0zcVqQtZ8bnAxpU13dbMOJYLl3+bvSPsIw82DWqlNYVvqcpq08czpeXzNw/Xy SBU1fXH7NGmpVChp0DJRegt+PJqi4nkzkGuOGq+fhZEejVZ4JWQfw1kSKh4MBfPuDPHP ejg9VCeG55eMnz2URn4wIpGkfx/aMA05wcAootUligzNtaNzqCewGZ61o71IWRnrZ359 qA6VLe6Wswd66w2s8ceN4Oe2M4g0IEROl7bG6UMX7fG1iOZko5vGWaXHhKBDI6X0Vboj ldAYND1s5VvXSg4SshJ9cUwpBoVeVCHe9ZiUeKBHE6ZR51mFHvGVOoyK9KhUqkMfqb+l PIxw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id y14si18916437pfr.82.2019.08.01.02.34.52; Thu, 01 Aug 2019 02:35:08 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730182AbfHAINj (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 1 Aug 2019 04:13:39 -0400 Received: from Galois.linutronix.de ([193.142.43.55]:34251 "EHLO Galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726185AbfHAINi (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Aug 2019 04:13:38 -0400 Received: from pd9ef1cb8.dip0.t-ipconnect.de ([217.239.28.184] helo=nanos) by Galois.linutronix.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1ht6DM-0000OO-2f; Thu, 01 Aug 2019 10:13:32 +0200 Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2019 10:13:31 +0200 (CEST) From: Thomas Gleixner To: Aubrey Li cc: Daniel Drake , x86@kernel.org, "Li, Aubrey" , Ingo Molnar , "H . Peter Anvin" , Linux Kernel , Endless Linux Upstreaming Team Subject: Re: setup_boot_APIC_clock() NULL dereference during early boot on reduced hardware platforms In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Alpine 2.21 (DEB 202 2017-01-01) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Linutronix-Spam-Score: -1.0 X-Linutronix-Spam-Level: - X-Linutronix-Spam-Status: No , -1.0 points, 5.0 required, ALL_TRUSTED=-1,SHORTCIRCUIT=-0.0001 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 1 Aug 2019, Aubrey Li wrote: > On Thu, Aug 1, 2019 at 3:35 PM Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > > > On Thu, 1 Aug 2019, Aubrey Li wrote: > > > On Thu, Aug 1, 2019 at 2:26 PM Daniel Drake wrote: > > > > global_clock_event is NULL here. This is a "reduced hardware" ACPI > > > > platform so acpi_generic_reduced_hw_init() has set timer_init to NULL, > > > > avoiding the usual codepaths that would set up global_clock_event. > > > > > > > IIRC, acpi_generic_reduced_hw_init() avoids initializing PIT, the status of > > > this legacy device is unknown in ACPI hw-reduced mode. > > > > > > > I tried the obvious: > > > > if (!global_clock_event) > > > > return -1; > > > > > > > No, the platform needs a global clock event, can you turn on some other > > > > Wrong. The kernel boots perfectly fine without a global clock event. But > > for that the TSC and LAPIC frequency must be known. > > I think LAPIC fast calibrate is only supported on intel platform, while > Daniel's box is an AMD platform. That's why lapic_init_clockevent() failed > and fall into the code path which needs a global clock event. We know that. The point is that it does not matter which vendor a CPU comes from. The kernel does support legacyless boot when the frequencies are known. Whether that's currently possible on that particular CPU is a different question. Thanks, tglx