Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Thu, 1 Aug 2019 13:41:21 +0100
From:   Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com>
To:     Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>
CC:     Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>,
        Alexandru Ardelean <alexandru.ardelean@analog.com>,
        "open list:IIO SUBSYSTEM AND DRIVERS" <linux-iio@vger.kernel.org>,
        linux-spi <linux-spi@vger.kernel.org>,
        <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
        "Mark Brown" <broonie@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3][V4] dt-bindings: iio: imu: add bindings for
 ADIS16460
Message-ID: <20190801134121.00003097@huawei.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAL_JsqLXTnrtCr4hVVc9HrOkkvwGWk02EibdutfUBm4JDnJO5Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20190723073641.27801-1-alexandru.ardelean@analog.com>
        <20190723073641.27801-4-alexandru.ardelean@analog.com>
        <20190727195623.42c8b4f3@archlinux>
        <CAL_JsqLXTnrtCr4hVVc9HrOkkvwGWk02EibdutfUBm4JDnJO5Q@mail.gmail.com>
Organization: Huawei
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, 29 Jul 2019 17:24:40 -0600
Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org> wrote:

> On Sat, Jul 27, 2019 at 12:56 PM Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 23 Jul 2019 10:36:40 +0300
> > Alexandru Ardelean <alexandru.ardelean@analog.com> wrote:
> >  
> > > This change adds device-tree bindings for the ADIS16460.
> > >
> > > Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
> > > Signed-off-by: Alexandru Ardelean <alexandru.ardelean@analog.com>  
> >
> > Really trivial, but convention (as driven by what git am -s does if nothing
> > else, is to add extra tags in chronological order.  So Rob would be after
> > you.  I tweaked it which I don't always remember to do.  
> 
> I'd argue it is in chronological order as the submitter added my tag
> and then sent it out. If you applied it and added my tag, then it
> would be after (but before yours).

Bike shedding to follow...

Possibly but given you gave the Reviewed-by for v2, and it hasn't changed
is Alex's the same Signed-off-by as seen on V2, or a new one reflecting the
addition of your Reviewed-by? 

:)


> 
> > It's not consistent across the kernel but I'll fight for my little corner
> > to be :)  
> 
> More consistency would be nice then there's less tribal knowledge
> about maintainers for submitters to learn.

Agreed.

Jonathan

> 
> Rob