Received: by 2002:a25:ad19:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id y25csp7424635ybi; Thu, 1 Aug 2019 08:01:46 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwAO5OvwDUJq7tb/A0xroBo9qNgs7y4VNwsP4HVG0wYO0jwJ+rENmGDSI8Ptzxwre+wXAav X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:8509:: with SMTP id bj9mr127739983plb.79.1564671706374; Thu, 01 Aug 2019 08:01:46 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1564671706; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=ubanNB6afMf0zV5PfP0H5tyonVZWlsByOGhJRJTH1OoTUGyynxNUqkvDysN3OeYnBt bM67q2Pz/zrHHNfBOehyjgTboPmG8h1NxzPL+CIZenPnXGWnbdHsaASTCmtPlXjbOUMk d+h4LgK+v1WHHCFxsHV3nMqhoxtuE/o+PWxXYzofNotPqdH495FvHPi1G/Orb9/CrZAn rvDtepKXBBW+PERo0glg5JgPDhd4KN/VMp+PfdNTaTKRELPybLCzWenu74QSXSHiDWEq GKxdwpscWqh4kGtuMDsxMWRGL3L+QtdN/YeewEtpZw7caP77lG0cLGyH9rvFXPVPQIb5 JAaQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:mime-version:user-agent:organization :references:in-reply-to:date:cc:to:from:subject:message-id; bh=N65hFiNj2GdFe0usLPbR1b9LTJ/YPCHwqrDIQJX7Cuc=; b=cYDh4LWPq8TcSccVAz2+bo0jTYQ4bGABupK9pH2F0iIcjaQPh3UN42QcwPg5HJ3tKa Ik65oLDs9+XMuaW967P/qBSrpD/vOyysLX6HPqqTile5JQv+rj8QtuhaTS4APwtHthEE hmKx1IVqwERpJH1AsbXNGpO4+nTANgA+nGgeMcO96aVMCl8cSDWPUQO/C6r806RUb9vU qtWo8Ek/OjTlRAl+/Bi+lOlxPD+0dwWnykVO0tJInKL7T5HZuhaAgDBNzjgE1Qmqzv7Q 5chyZ+5BjM6gXY0gSlXd6OLawQQ2Wo2U2kuTJe3q/jla9ltBKBe0J9R5F8L8+lgsHzkM x8cw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id x25si36007506pfn.13.2019.08.01.08.01.27; Thu, 01 Aug 2019 08:01:46 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1731490AbfHAM5x (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 1 Aug 2019 08:57:53 -0400 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:38418 "EHLO mx1.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1730887AbfHAM5x (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Aug 2019 08:57:53 -0400 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.220.254]) by mx1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1A5DAD17; Thu, 1 Aug 2019 12:57:51 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <04700afaf68114b5ab329f5a5182e21578c15795.camel@suse.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: Disable wake-affine vCPU process to mitigate lock holder preemption From: Dario Faggioli To: Wanpeng Li , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org Cc: Paolo Bonzini , Radim =?UTF-8?Q?Kr=C4=8Dm=C3=A1=C5=99?= , Peter Zijlstra , Thomas Gleixner Date: Thu, 01 Aug 2019 14:57:50 +0200 In-Reply-To: <1564479235-25074-1-git-send-email-wanpengli@tencent.com> References: <1564479235-25074-1-git-send-email-wanpengli@tencent.com> Organization: SUSE Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-vBZfl3lnf5iunDc9R2jw" User-Agent: Evolution 3.32.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --=-vBZfl3lnf5iunDc9R2jw Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 2019-07-30 at 17:33 +0800, Wanpeng Li wrote: > However, in multiple VMs over-subscribe virtualization scenario, it > increases=20 > the probability to incur vCPU stacking which means that the sibling > vCPUs from=20 > the same VM will be stacked on one pCPU. I test three 80 vCPUs VMs > running on=20 > one 80 pCPUs Skylake server(PLE is supported), the ebizzy score can > increase 17%=20 > after disabling wake-affine for vCPU process.=20 >=20 Can't we achieve this by removing SD_WAKE_AFFINE from the relevant scheduling domains? By acting on /proc/sys/kernel/sched_domain/cpuX/domainY/flags, I mean? Of course this will impact all tasks, not only KVM vcpus. But if the host does KVM only anyway... Regards --=20 Dario Faggioli, Ph.D http://about.me/dario.faggioli Virtualization Software Engineer SUSE Labs, SUSE https://www.suse.com/ ------------------------------------------------------------------- <> (Raistlin Majere) --=-vBZfl3lnf5iunDc9R2jw Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEES5ssOj3Vhr0WPnOLFkJ4iaW4c+4FAl1C4c4ACgkQFkJ4iaW4 c+7UHg/+P8QYc8TBLL2Cq4O4prnodY1NuKoDBoyLlSg+nYJ19AbFovcVqlKwx9BM laUFBLg9B5WaqEk6aoT9TSuzvsAagZYOqLBP8m1JtweVUa3anBeTYZ8qKgyP96tZ zTUt/xjUyIJ6PWnSbhqB6umvkugVH+o5YZPWjWc1oVPxV+PwXdsSLZt3sjYIcsVJ Gb7NAZIM7nSyoFdiwcC5D42frnVaLzNz1w70tlOJ0h4BP+SAk+7A5x32JtHTIOo6 YJETylcZwSqxDaONxOE83T8xOmCnL+zmAsKz0zlg+6gVfEjNwgZxfG3acGLxjMJR K9garfWrSsp5WHDnx5eGXjA82ZlOdtdv34h7O9YWBvmqrpXGVogMJObbAw3PTLWz 4LPFtkS3ZMF2LuL+wpFDiZyw1Powk2yBbgNQIn6R0cESp4hgk9FxTDIddzOZnrak GCb7Tnlx4i3onGD4oSQ4+K8b56c0isVzUL4vusXbYj0u5O+j/uv/DfS2njH3eLgX 36QXdnqgzjTPvKuWW01PIbx0dKUYPfRI4oSzXd3WdvNjUZkLvIn9HBOGQQesXfBe FERg8UEO6TV0mvPCtdAygqreZ67yDKzEi+cjw3st1B6C9lqo4uy7dirKESoSBzC4 tJ/s9r2771rl33lkhqzJFxB9FqI0ycZUKq/rWeXJZGJGjP7DM/Y= =/DLl -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-vBZfl3lnf5iunDc9R2jw--