Received: by 2002:a25:ad19:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id y25csp7661185ybi; Thu, 1 Aug 2019 11:39:19 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyM3702VrwqwH8Omza8ji+U6RUHqYqp4nR6wNsPTiNI6HGw+5BJ5prH7WQCB2hdL2IVJ5Bj X-Received: by 2002:a63:2264:: with SMTP id t36mr113292660pgm.87.1564684758884; Thu, 01 Aug 2019 11:39:18 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1564684758; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=RjgpnAtXl9HnLaZwK4ztW9/dx7oY8eFyAAj2cJq4R+paKfhiRdbBY9v2VMK0Vj6iq5 KLYZPsYogOI+GSfueZLY/tkdul4yXm0bPmrEfXAdbcSO/Q4U6EOJpaPjcDIyuOUb+DKk 9Zad7z9MgwobnIkJoYm3rjo5syLy0ZuP10nhtFp2bEkNVN+mmXG4FHoBmHzQJMnU3nJS 5hp4PJJ2JfU0V2oeUztk8XQBvgWtcGYkDIXY+QdyDmp5IZO4z+BnDSzIvLMrQ/+ol1LN TNbQcQGpPCLghPpqIsHevIZEU25bXUFhqjKu0oejvYJYuKH/YdS4BZytjk762gat6xUN AQ6A== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:dkim-signature:content-language :content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:from:references:cc:to:subject; bh=7+1PFHicTud3X5V5EB7upBR1QSBsHrLd4rrZFOsAsuU=; b=BMnplzsxn+JNfqpEs/LfNkitirebsTlfGvT7zOACk9WWhudytOxoIBDMTAlBm63fEB vl/dKPiP8Xl4adhfxYOvfIHTKacfPZTLZSHEs2DIKyeQXVVtLH/mNVhXWX1wH9wGy52u P8qifWGTWYQ+joBOxI5UkzdLkp3paO4aGkxmYiAme5lyarMtK60QPgYHzd/Nwh9ksl5R 4zsh03CM3HEnQE3rvoCZIfQ6TNvFZLecXB6UfOfyr87OHVdzduUYHTWekuwlx4qR0W7N TJfQLlWOrsPeaM34hnBRljeLM3AI660gubIr8iv9oT/d+s3vTalpbJJGnykRyJ2gd4fF MuAQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@nvidia.com header.s=n1 header.b="kc/HiXp+"; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=nvidia.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 21si11893388pgk.492.2019.08.01.11.39.03; Thu, 01 Aug 2019 11:39:18 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@nvidia.com header.s=n1 header.b="kc/HiXp+"; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=nvidia.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2387890AbfHARxW (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 1 Aug 2019 13:53:22 -0400 Received: from hqemgate16.nvidia.com ([216.228.121.65]:17490 "EHLO hqemgate16.nvidia.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727508AbfHARxV (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Aug 2019 13:53:21 -0400 Received: from hqpgpgate102.nvidia.com (Not Verified[216.228.121.13]) by hqemgate16.nvidia.com (using TLS: TLSv1.2, DES-CBC3-SHA) id ; Thu, 01 Aug 2019 10:53:21 -0700 Received: from hqmail.nvidia.com ([172.20.161.6]) by hqpgpgate102.nvidia.com (PGP Universal service); Thu, 01 Aug 2019 10:53:20 -0700 X-PGP-Universal: processed; by hqpgpgate102.nvidia.com on Thu, 01 Aug 2019 10:53:20 -0700 Received: from [10.110.103.107] (10.124.1.5) by HQMAIL107.nvidia.com (172.20.187.13) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Thu, 1 Aug 2019 17:53:20 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 10/20] clk: tegra: clk-dfll: Add suspend and resume support To: Dmitry Osipenko , "thierry.reding@gmail.com" , Jonathan Hunter , "tglx@linutronix.de" , "jason@lakedaemon.net" , "marc.zyngier@arm.com" , "linus.walleij@linaro.org" , "stefan@agner.ch" , "mark.rutland@arm.com" CC: Peter De Schrijver , Prashant Gaikwad , "sboyd@kernel.org" , "linux-clk@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org" , Jui Chang Kuo , Joseph Lo , Timo Alho , "linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Mikko Perttunen , Sandipan Patra , "robh+dt@kernel.org" , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , "rjw@rjwysocki.net" , "viresh.kumar@linaro.org" , "linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" References: <1564607463-28802-1-git-send-email-skomatineni@nvidia.com> <1564607463-28802-11-git-send-email-skomatineni@nvidia.com> <4400ffef-685f-b9e6-3b07-4790f851282c@gmail.com> <501a9d0e-ce78-9b35-642d-dff7f9223926@gmail.com> <31990250-e237-ddb9-ce71-29b7c2302fc3@gmail.com> From: Sowjanya Komatineni Message-ID: <0dbc6d22-486c-8b45-bae1-b5ce4efdc370@nvidia.com> Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2019 10:53:21 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.7.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <31990250-e237-ddb9-ce71-29b7c2302fc3@gmail.com> X-Originating-IP: [10.124.1.5] X-ClientProxiedBy: HQMAIL105.nvidia.com (172.20.187.12) To HQMAIL107.nvidia.com (172.20.187.13) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Language: en-US DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nvidia.com; s=n1; t=1564682001; bh=7+1PFHicTud3X5V5EB7upBR1QSBsHrLd4rrZFOsAsuU=; h=X-PGP-Universal:Subject:To:CC:References:From:Message-ID:Date: User-Agent:MIME-Version:In-Reply-To:X-Originating-IP: X-ClientProxiedBy:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Language; b=kc/HiXp+yv/RKIiD5ZYFWDIGn3g8OcPGCCPnVUXbgrYM5NgD33I+ceTh+gl93GUEr 1dykTeQ2sCIRLzcqRAHytJTZFo9y/J1K8xEffgEF4CUtblfIywVqrTeymPuodiLK4M d1Dv40h3CECRQqYG9xmy2erXVSX1tHG8NsEOqcN0c9xqu2fJqReWvb+91ALTVAhV3i EcbhiNyvSM01eKtTfHRpp5DXDK6t3nr8gG3Jyhhi5OTetVPncgbIghYuPhSBTARrM9 OPpGuelOP8c7Lt3VUQ9LTSpLx03v1Xn+0XY7P6jtk7fXsXfSTfBTbkETHsLUly9QRI c7W9Y4/Aeis1w== Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 8/1/19 10:10 AM, Dmitry Osipenko wrote: > 01.08.2019 19:10, Sowjanya Komatineni =D0=BF=D0=B8=D1=88=D0=B5=D1=82: >> I didn=E2=80=99t updated any patches. This is still same v7 just resent = with >> CPUFreq maintainers in CC as I missed to add them earlier. > There are now two different threads for the same patches, which is not > very good. When I said that CPUFreq maintainers should be CC'ed, I > didn't mean to resend it all, sorry for not being clear about it. You > should've wait for more comments to the original patches and then make a > v8. I suggest to do the same in the current situation as well, please > address all the current comments and wait for 1-2 days, then make a v8. Thought version bump is only when changes were made. Got it now. Thanks Dmitry. Sure, will give some time for all feedbacks before=20 sending V8.