Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
From:   "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.ibm.com>
To:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
        mingo@kernel.org
Cc:     stern@rowland.harvard.edu, andrea.parri@amarulasolutions.com,
        will@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org, boqun.feng@gmail.com,
        npiggin@gmail.com, dhowells@redhat.com, j.alglave@ucl.ac.uk,
        luc.maranget@inria.fr, akiyks@gmail.com,
        "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@joelfernandes.org>,
        "Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH RFC memory-model 30/31] tools/memory-model: Use cumul-fence instead of fence in ->prop example
Date:   Thu,  1 Aug 2019 15:20:55 -0700
In-Reply-To: <20190801222026.GA11315@linux.ibm.com>
References: <20190801222026.GA11315@linux.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <20190801222056.12144-30-paulmck@linux.ibm.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

From: "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@joelfernandes.org>

To reduce ambiguity in the more exotic ->prop ordering example, this
commit uses the term cumul-fence instead of the term fence for the two
fences, so that the implict ->rfe on loads/stores to Y are covered by
the description.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190729121745.GA140682@google.com

Suggested-by: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Acked-by: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.ibm.com>
---
 tools/memory-model/Documentation/explanation.txt | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/memory-model/Documentation/explanation.txt b/tools/memory-model/Documentation/explanation.txt
index 68caa9a976d0..634dc6db26c4 100644
--- a/tools/memory-model/Documentation/explanation.txt
+++ b/tools/memory-model/Documentation/explanation.txt
@@ -1302,7 +1302,7 @@ followed by an arbitrary number of cumul-fence links, ending with an
 rfe link.  You can concoct more exotic examples, containing more than
 one fence, although this quickly leads to diminishing returns in terms
 of complexity.  For instance, here's an example containing a coe link
-followed by two fences and an rfe link, utilizing the fact that
+followed by two cumul-fences and an rfe link, utilizing the fact that
 release fences are A-cumulative:
 
 	int x, y, z;
@@ -1334,10 +1334,10 @@ If x = 2, r0 = 1, and r2 = 1 after this code runs then there is a prop
 link from P0's store to its load.  This is because P0's store gets
 overwritten by P1's store since x = 2 at the end (a coe link), the
 smp_wmb() ensures that P1's store to x propagates to P2 before the
-store to y does (the first fence), the store to y propagates to P2
+store to y does (the first cumul-fence), the store to y propagates to P2
 before P2's load and store execute, P2's smp_store_release()
 guarantees that the stores to x and y both propagate to P0 before the
-store to z does (the second fence), and P0's load executes after the
+store to z does (the second cumul-fence), and P0's load executes after the
 store to z has propagated to P0 (an rfe link).
 
 In summary, the fact that the hb relation links memory access events
-- 
2.17.1