Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Fri, 2 Aug 2019 11:26:13 +0300
From:   Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
To:     Fabrizio Castro <fabrizio.castro@bp.renesas.com>
Cc:     Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham+renesas@ideasonboard.com>,
        Jacopo Mondi <jacopo+renesas@jmondi.org>,
        David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
        dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>,
        Chris Paterson <Chris.Paterson2@renesas.com>,
        Biju Das <biju.das@bp.renesas.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC 09/12] drm: rcar-du: lvds: Fix companion's mode
Message-ID: <20190802082613.GJ5008@pendragon.ideasonboard.com>
References: <1564731249-22671-1-git-send-email-fabrizio.castro@bp.renesas.com>
 <1564731249-22671-10-git-send-email-fabrizio.castro@bp.renesas.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1564731249-22671-10-git-send-email-fabrizio.castro@bp.renesas.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Hi Fabrizio,

Thank you for the patch.

On Fri, Aug 02, 2019 at 08:34:06AM +0100, Fabrizio Castro wrote:
> The companion encoder needs to be told to use the same
> mode as the primary encoder.
> 
> Fixes: e9e8798ab7b8 ("drm: rcar-du: lvds: Add support for dual-link mode")
> Signed-off-by: Fabrizio Castro <fabrizio.castro@bp.renesas.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_lvds.c | 6 +++++-
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_lvds.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_lvds.c
> index edd63f5..7944ae9 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_lvds.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_lvds.c
> @@ -415,8 +415,12 @@ static void rcar_lvds_enable(struct drm_bridge *bridge)
>  		return;
>  
>  	/* Enable the companion LVDS encoder in dual-link mode. */
> -	if (lvds->dual_link && lvds->companion)
> +	if (lvds->dual_link && lvds->companion) {
> +		struct rcar_lvds *companion_lvds = bridge_to_rcar_lvds(
> +							lvds->companion);
> +		companion_lvds->mode = lvds->mode;
>  		lvds->companion->funcs->enable(lvds->companion);
> +	}

Would it make sense to do this in rcar_lvds_mode_set() instead, to keep
the mode set code grouped in a single place ?

>  
>  	/*
>  	 * Hardcode the channels and control signals routing for now.

-- 
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart