Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1161018AbVLJUEw (ORCPT ); Sat, 10 Dec 2005 15:04:52 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1161058AbVLJUEw (ORCPT ); Sat, 10 Dec 2005 15:04:52 -0500 Received: from bayc1-pasmtp01.bayc1.hotmail.com ([65.54.191.161]:48550 "EHLO BAYC1-PASMTP01.bayc1.hotmail.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1161018AbVLJUEv (ORCPT ); Sat, 10 Dec 2005 15:04:51 -0500 Message-ID: X-Originating-IP: [69.156.6.171] X-Originating-Email: [seanlkml@sympatico.ca] Message-ID: <39068.10.10.10.28.1134245083.squirrel@linux1> In-Reply-To: <439A7E8E.8010707@wolfmountaingroup.com> References: <21d7e9970512051610n1244467am12adc8373c1a4473@mail.gmail.com> <20051206040820.GB26602@kroah.com> <2cd57c900512052358m5b631204i@mail.gmail.com> <200512061856.42493.luke-jr@utopios.org> <2cd57c900512061742s28f57b5eu@mail.gmail.com> <20051210051628.E9E08CF4156@tsurukikun.utopios.org> <439A7E8E.8010707@wolfmountaingroup.com> Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2005 15:04:43 -0500 (EST) Subject: [way OT] Re: GNU/Linux in a binary world... a doomsday scenario From: "Sean" To: "Jeff V. Merkey" Cc: "Coywolf Qi Hunt" , luke-jr@utopios.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.4-2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal X-OriginalArrivalTime: 10 Dec 2005 20:04:45.0066 (UTC) FILETIME=[F7147EA0:01C5FDC4] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2275 Lines: 57 On Sat, December 10, 2005 2:06 am, Jeff V. Merkey said: > "constructive" is a for profit model that sustains the hi tech industry. > The current There are for-profit models of selling GPL software. Anyway, billions of dollars are still spent every year on software. > models have created a conduit for socialist disintegration of the > american hi tech markets, loss of jobs, and have funnelled technology out You should look at the dwindling manufacturing sector in America and notice that the same thing is happening there without any GPL to blame. > of the country. Legal defense funds should be the biggest red flags of > all. If this system you devised really works, why all the litigation? > Why all the need for legal defense funds and patent infringement This is just utter nonsense; most litigation in the software industry occurs between closed source vendors. > insurance? I've watched the entire market slowly collapse over the > years as the result of the affect of the GPL on America's hi tech > markets. By which measure has the market collapsed? Whatever you mean, my guess is that you're overestimating the role of the GPL. More likely, you're just misinterpreting globalization and the natural transition of the sector into more of a commodity market. > It isn't working, and it isn't sustainable. non-profit and "temples" of > GPL "religion" have evolved, with the leaders living in orgnaizations Hah! By your definition of the word, American capitalism is just another "religion". > that subsist from handouts and donations. This movement has spawned a > global attitude that has no respect for IP rights, and it's extended This movement has spawned a global attitude supporting greater consumer rights. Overall, its been a very positive and healthy force. > itself to no respect for human rights, or any other rights of the > indivdual. That's the legacy this has left and the ultimate > conclusion. Oh please, how exactly does GPL software undermine human rights? Cheers, Sean - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/