Received: by 2002:a25:b794:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id n20csp658403ybh; Sat, 3 Aug 2019 07:09:25 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxQOcyrs7p5lsV9TzXmPpAW8diqydNZ7oqoSCpxVeJQ/i6XLvJHCXJtARCV25zHmN0eKRNU X-Received: by 2002:aa7:9afc:: with SMTP id y28mr63665207pfp.252.1564841365113; Sat, 03 Aug 2019 07:09:25 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1564841365; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=uHQ5zWX4pf+xtkf2i1gdu+EuDzjZbHaUSSjBQtkHsvKG+fIyobPkaNIehEbQ8JCHQV UB+kEoOxtnMwt2CdZliqLh1UZjJYUBQYLfXZ6vNaD/zTJc+5XfrdM9nDwJN5LFwNOtRO 7OxLjjLP2/PmIRk+SgeCgusQToj++qKzGt886WnHNTVyi5BaIDMGM0mBLK/jKT7IChba QMdgMBNKawsjvCArUHgrfnKNLaG6j5QBezDasHAnsO9XKjZ9ia/ogGMuDYp95yjgbM0i ShutxzvZhvM+b3fpLGAVSJcifolqXaoHQgZCP9yAmB8ejDXu7/CVjS0XdIG+r80I+bgC 6+1w== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date; bh=fC/IWFUoYPr99DSBG+2wJ0BLijRYg9Wix0WPpHDOR9k=; b=PI5AyGfFZNA4LWjLWiP1ySrPWRca4US2QWWbDNrOLKdzddsbThltd3T/so+FlJSg33 srYGo+FA6RqhyhESn35jWYvd0ac1flJRdef59ooSIUCX412N16eNGwhH4MwPo6CeAVry bXS4DZjGgAVoc9vilomPH81ONocRoy7kNOtbJGbmjJTry6mWJcRTc5dVZWYOAJhDeyHC 4l9LhnjywQPxeco4mHaT3jlesu1slJ2eQZl3MDaemNvjdXi44J4b7ekFZ1rz1qN1CvdJ Cgcl6hGZLVsxBUL7mELSX73zmPdAp9X1WeMA3XaZLj2DrSCaHIJ+PF/LcBCYWvqAdDdN HDVA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=canonical.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id f89si9207609pje.50.2019.08.03.07.09.10; Sat, 03 Aug 2019 07:09:25 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=canonical.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2436668AbfHBO1k (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 2 Aug 2019 10:27:40 -0400 Received: from youngberry.canonical.com ([91.189.89.112]:55132 "EHLO youngberry.canonical.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2394891AbfHBO1h (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Aug 2019 10:27:37 -0400 Received: from 162-237-133-238.lightspeed.rcsntx.sbcglobal.net ([162.237.133.238] helo=elm) by youngberry.canonical.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1htYWl-0002GM-Bi; Fri, 02 Aug 2019 14:27:27 +0000 Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2019 09:27:22 -0500 From: Tyler Hicks To: Roberto Sassu , Jarkko Sakkinen Cc: jejb@linux.ibm.com, zohar@linux.ibm.com, jgg@ziepe.ca, linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, keyrings@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, crazyt2019+lml@gmail.com, nayna@linux.vnet.ibm.com, silviu.vlasceanu@huawei.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] KEYS: trusted: allow module init if TPM is inactive or deactivated Message-ID: <20190802142721.GA26616@elm> References: <20190705163735.11539-1-roberto.sassu@huawei.com> <20190711194811.rfsohbfc3a7carpa@linux.intel.com> <20190801163215.mfkagoafkxscesne@linux.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2019-08-02 10:21:16, Roberto Sassu wrote: > On 8/1/2019 6:32 PM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 15, 2019 at 06:44:28PM +0200, Roberto Sassu wrote: > > > According to the bug report at https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/62678, > > > the trusted module is a dependency of the ecryptfs module. We should > > > load the trusted module even if the TPM is inactive or deactivated. > > > > > > Given that commit 782779b60faa ("tpm: Actually fail on TPM errors during > > > "get random"") changes the return code of tpm_get_random(), the patch > > > should be modified to ignore the -EIO error. I will send a new version. > > > > Do you have information where this dependency comes from? > > ecryptfs retrieves the encryption key from encrypted keys (see > ecryptfs_get_encrypted_key()). That has been there for many years with any problems. It was added in 2011: commit 1252cc3b232e582e887623dc5f70979418caaaa2 Author: Roberto Sassu Date: Mon Jun 27 13:45:45 2011 +0200 eCryptfs: added support for the encrypted key type What's recently changed the situation is this patch: commit 240730437deb213a58915830884e1a99045624dc Author: Roberto Sassu Date: Wed Feb 6 17:24:51 2019 +0100 KEYS: trusted: explicitly use tpm_chip structure from tpm_default_chip() Now eCryptfs has a hard dependency on a TPM chip that's working as expected even if eCryptfs (or the rest of the system) isn't utilizing the TPM. If the TPM behaves unexpectedly, you can't access your files. We need to get this straightened out soon. Tyler > > Roberto > > -- > HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES Duesseldorf GmbH, HRB 56063 > Managing Director: Li Peng, Li Jian, Shi Yanli