Received: by 2002:a25:b794:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id n20csp782746ybh; Sat, 3 Aug 2019 09:41:04 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzXAHVJbV04tqjzhZOBNYl2VOvZ021M/8Gs3TwPMwVCNj3isQAtd5aC/Q25XGtGH96yhis4 X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:2023:: with SMTP id n32mr9572657pjc.3.1564850464405; Sat, 03 Aug 2019 09:41:04 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1564850464; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=YRc+cnICdjxyacZVUonSB40kK89IrkJt87Ir0fUzhgMW3jnlq+FoVvycpftzU/Xgb6 CeHsaRyNhhSy1FauzSlC/Qvwo+Vge85i6781Xj2noS52BQdi2s780oi/56e7amOxmiG0 pFFGJWhyFawDXB7B9ueCmtTXHFm169MLXQrVB9Fb2VdWKaTN90HJ/N06GIK4UpvrA0pG eNkjiO7+nl4sEIrfP7SDOywMxyXDAutiLSasOiETKT1j/lVojcU/a9oSfFZxYKJtkiq4 VZ/vIx3IAaucAQEEKxUHPVDY9L6N3SkY2VUQ2aYZFMcwyeg0HG4JB3eN/ulabWrVijjr mbYA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=8bGXxz16oKR90ETpT/4ynxa+Xj0DtXCWJlIIrFI2etQ=; b=QONFfhyphfqHtuwpBCXRjNKnSUuvGUHHnPf/H+R1l9PjZJBSYKXug0uuIjjWAGAUbu bPJtVKacxuQDcHD6Tqh6GPHZvFuu+BfGTfNAVj79hx4577mJLQ4DX+zGk9rBSOpndgWz p/wdsSzLKyhTo+DBdNGYM8F3uZTxClHsqkeewYp09522875Qgi9rz5Tfo0w2hwylZG1d +d84pTsYyjl/REENncmNI7WTGMp9cxnT3Mxpw6hxykCERxaF9256dBcSaESJFI8e2/hg qt8cDVM1vQtx9lXbGLzWqLiwEZrZAry8KW0bDzMJhiDRjzhrKhGbT1d0V4rRHqWUIYsw sfjA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id f17si43972074pgh.552.2019.08.03.09.40.49; Sat, 03 Aug 2019 09:41:04 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2405856AbfHBRmc (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 2 Aug 2019 13:42:32 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:48972 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2405681AbfHBRmb (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Aug 2019 13:42:31 -0400 Received: from gandalf.local.home (cpe-66-24-58-225.stny.res.rr.com [66.24.58.225]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5FE11217F5; Fri, 2 Aug 2019 17:42:30 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2019 13:42:28 -0400 From: Steven Rostedt To: Divya Indi Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Joe Jin , Aruna Ramakrishna , Srinivas Eeda Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/7] tracing: Un-export ftrace_set_clr_event Message-ID: <20190802134229.2a969047@gandalf.local.home> In-Reply-To: <8e50d405-a4fb-fadf-509e-157b031d7542@oracle.com> References: <1564444954-28685-1-git-send-email-divya.indi@oracle.com> <1564444954-28685-8-git-send-email-divya.indi@oracle.com> <20190729205138.689864d2@gandalf.local.home> <8e50d405-a4fb-fadf-509e-157b031d7542@oracle.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.3 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 30 Jul 2019 15:29:41 -0700 Divya Indi wrote: > Hi Steven, > > On 7/29/19 5:51 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > On Mon, 29 Jul 2019 17:02:34 -0700 > > Divya Indi wrote: > > > >> Use "trace_array_set_clr_event" to enable/disable events to a trace > >> array from other kernel modules/components. > >> Hence, we no longer need to have ftrace_set_clr_event as an exported API. > > Hmm, this simply reverts patch 1. Why have patch 1 and this patch in > > the first place? > > Right! First patch fixes issues in a previous commit and then this patch > reverts the part of previous commit that required the fix. > > We can eliminate the first patch if it seems counter intuitive. > > As a stand alone patch, the first one may be fine. But as part of a series, it doesn't make sense to add it. -- Steve